[TCUG] Re: Pedestrian Crossing Zig-Zags & Decriminalisation of Parking Restrictions

  • From: "Welsh, Paul" <Paul.Welsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 16:17:25 +0100

I suggest you look very carefully at the Pedestrian Crossing Regulations,
very carefully indeed.

PW

-----Original Message-----
From: Alistair McClean [mailto:alistair.mcclean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 29 July 2002 13:29
To: tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [TCUG] Pedestrian Crossing Zig-Zags & Decriminalisation of Parking
Restrictions


At Nottingham City Council we already employ Parking Enforcement Officers to
enforce metered on-street parking spaces in Nottingham City Centre, and the
authority is currently moving towards decriminalisation of all parking /
loading restrictions within its administrative boundary.

This has created a potential problem at pelican / puffin / toucans with
zig-zag markings. It would appear that those involved in the decrim process
are proposing that due to a potential lack of police enforcement on these
zig-zags, they will be seen as a good place to park to escape the clutches
of the council employed enforcement officers. Therefore TROs are being
processed to allow yellow lines to be laid in all pedestrian crossing
controlled zones, in addition to the zig-zags, to enable enforcement by the
Officers.

Our concerns in Traffic Signal Design are that, at best,  the combination of
yellow lines and zig-zags may not be enforceable, and that if there was an
accident at a crossing site whilst a vehicle was stopped on the zig-zags,
the authority would be liable as the 'no stopping at any time' message of
the zig-zags would be contradicted by the 'no parking' message of double
yellow lines (i.e. loading/unloading, picking up/setting down is
permissible) (a no loading at any time Order is not proposed as this would
require a public enquiry).

I have been led to believe that other authorities in this situation have
provided both yellow lines and zig-zags. If so, was authorization obtained?
Does anyone have experience in this matter?

Alistair McClean
Traffic Signal Design - Nottingham City Council



________________________________________________________________________
Unless otherwise expressly stated, nothing in this e-mail shall, as between
the City Council and the recipient and/or any other party, be deemed to
constitute any contract or order or create any kind of contractual
relationship.
____________________________________________________________________________
______

THE FOLLOWING WARNING IS GIVEN IS RESPECT OF ANY ATTACHMENTS

1.      Whilst Nottingham City Council takes steps to prevent computer
viruses from being transmitted via electronic mail attachments, it does not
give any guarantee that attachments do not contain such viruses.  You are
strongly advised to undertake anti-virus checks prior to accessing any
attachments to this electronic mail. 
2.      Nottingham City Council shall not be responsible for any detrimental
reliance you place on any attachments and makes no representations or
warranties of any kind with respect to any attachments or their contents and
disclaims all such representations and warranties.  In addition, Nottingham
City Council makes no representations or warranties about the accuracy,
completeness or suitability for any purposes of any attachments.  Any
attachments may contain technical inaccuracies or typographical errors.  All
liability of Nottingham City Council howsoever arising for any such
inaccuracies or errors is expressly excluded to the fullest extent permitted
by law.
3.      Neither Nottingham City Council, nor any of its staff will be liable
for damages arising out of or in connection with the use of any attachments.
This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages
of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect
or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage
to property and claims of third parties.   
4.      All brand names, product names and titles and copyrights used in any
attachments, are the trade marks or trade names or copyrights of their
respective holders.  No permission is given by Nottingham City Council in
respect of the use of any such brand names, product names or titles or
copyrights and such use may constitute an infringement of the holder's
rights.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses
****************************************************************************
****************************************************************
-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about
the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug
-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about
the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug

Other related posts: