If you are going 75 with the reduction boxes, you are spinning the heck out of your motor. Going with increased bore and single-port intake/heads is going to make it peter out earlier because you are would be trying to push more A/F mixture through a smaller tube. That only works with turbos. :-) Unfortunately I dont' see a good solution for what you want. -David -----Original message----- From: wuzmop@xxxxxxx Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 06:51:34 -0500 To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [tcb] Re: Type 2 - 1967 & Earlier - Stock or Type 2 - 1967 & Earlier -Custom > > I have to agree here. I've toyed with the idea of a sp 1776 for my bus, but I > want to retain my redux boxes, and I've shyed away from it for the reasons > Sammy listed. I can already do 75 on a good day, cruise at 65-70 easily with > my 1600 dp. > > I'd be curious about you guys' opinions on how a 1776 sp would compare to > what I have now. The only reason I would even entertain the idea is I want sp > for appearance, but don't want to loose the mph I have now. Better yet, what > would you build (on a budget) to suit my needs? > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: sammie smith <bugcollections@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Thu, Apr 8, 2010 7:33 am > Subject: [tcb] Re: Type 2 - 1967 & Earlier - Stock or Type 2 - 1967 & Earlier > - Custom > > > > No, I don't like 1776 and 1835s. The secret of power for most VW driving is > more torque, which you get by stroking for more CCs, not increasing the bore. > Lyle Cherry used to build a great stroker 1800cc and the guys at Oakhill > Auto have figured out a way to build a super reliable 2007cc. And to keep it > stock looking you gotta go with single port heads and stock carbs and > exhaust, then you are sort of defeating the purpose of a big motor if you put > stock carbs, exhaust and single port heads on it. And if you think I am a > "stock" guy, just take a look at my Baja. Better yet, I'll take you for a > ride in it and show you what a 2 liter stroker motor will do to the > acceleration of a VW. > > > > From: Denis Dodson <coocoo@xxxxxxx> > To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Wed, April 7, 2010 8:56:24 PM > Subject: [tcb] Re: Type 2 - 1967 & Earlier - Stock or Type 2 - 1967 & Earlier > - Custom > > > But, being a stock guy, you would never go to a 1776? > > > From: tcb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tcb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > sammie smith > Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 8:54 PM > To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [tcb] Re: Type 2 - 1967 & Earlier - Stock or Type 2 - 1967 & Earlier > - Custom > > > > They cruise Ok up to about 60-65, which is about as fast as I want to drive a > stock sprung bus. But, if I were building an engine for them and still > wanted to look stock I would build a single port 1600 with a dog house for > cooling. Westies are also a lot heavier than panel vans or even a nornal > kombi or deluxe so a little extra power to pull all of the weight would be > nice. > > > > > From: Eric Woodall <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Wed, April 7, 2010 3:47:03 PM > Subject: [tcb] Re: Type 2 - 1967 & Earlier - Stock or Type 2 - 1967 & Earlier > - Custom > > A turbo single port 1500 would be cool. > > Quoting atx <atx_bus@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > How do you like the 1500? Have enough guts and top end speed? > > > > Jeff > > > > sent via iPhone > > > > > > On Apr 7, 2010, at 6:02 PM, sammie smith <bugcollections@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > Yes. Both of my Westies, 65 and 66 have their original 1500 engines and > > they are bone stock. > > > > From: atx <atx_bus@xxxxxxxxx> > > To: "tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Wed, April 7, 2010 5:30:02 PM > > Subject: [tcb] Re: Type 2 - 1967 & Earlier - Stock or Type 2 - 1967 & > > Earlier - Custom > > > > Sammie are you running a 1500 in your 65? > > > > When I get around to restoring my 66 hard top westy I'm planning to go > > stock with appearence but will probably upgrade the motor while staying > > single port. And maybe add some disc brakes. >