[SI-LIST] si-list administrivia
- From: Ray Anderson <Raymond.Anderson@xxxxxxx>
- To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 15:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
I'd like to pose a quick question to the list membership.
There has been a bit of discussion (both today and in the past) regarding
the function of the "Reply To:" and "Reply To All:" functions on si-list.
A. Present Functionality is:
"Reply To:" sends a message back to the list. (which I
personally like)
"Reply To All:" sends two messages back to the list (which is pretty
useless)
B. We can easily implement alternate functionality:
"Reply To:" sends a message back to the sender.
"Reply To All:" sends a message to both the sender and the list.
I've been kind of resisting changing anything as I remember the confusion that
ensued the last time we toyed with this a couple years ago, but perhaps it
is time to make things work 'right' whatever that is.
I'm soliciting comments: Do you prefer mode "A" (the way it presently is) or
mode "B"
(the alternate functionality) ?
Please reply directly to me rather than to the list (to enhance the technical
signal to
noise ratio on the list). After I gather a reasonable number of opinions I'll
summarize
the responses and modify (or not) the way the REPLY function works on list
messages.
-Ray Anderson
Sun Microsystems Inc.
Staff SI Engineer & (si-list admin)
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- Follow-Ups:
- [SI-LIST] Re: si-list administrivia
- From: Geoff Haines
- [SI-LIST] Re: si-list administrivia
- From: Geoff Haines
- [SI-LIST] Re: si-list administrivia
- From: S. Weir
- [SI-LIST] Re: si-list administrivia
- From: David Instone
- [SI-LIST] Re: si-list administrivia
- From: Ken Cantrell
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] si-list administrivia.......
- » [SI-LIST] si-list administrivia
- » [SI-LIST] si-list administrivia
- » [SI-LIST] Re: si-list administrivia
- » [SI-LIST] Re: si-list administrivia
- » [SI-LIST] Re: si-list administrivia
- » [SI-LIST] Re: si-list administrivia
- » [SI-LIST] Re: si-list administrivia
- » [SI-LIST] Re: si-list administrivia
- » [SI-LIST] Re: si-list administrivia
- [SI-LIST] Re: si-list administrivia
- From: Geoff Haines
- [SI-LIST] Re: si-list administrivia
- From: Geoff Haines
- [SI-LIST] Re: si-list administrivia
- From: S. Weir
- [SI-LIST] Re: si-list administrivia
- From: David Instone
- [SI-LIST] Re: si-list administrivia
- From: Ken Cantrell