[SI-LIST] Re: si-list administrivia

I prefer Mode B, why type in individual address when you have the option to
in Mode B.  It's good to have when the need to correspond off-list is
warranted.  It also seems to be the correct way the mailing system should
work:

Reply = To sender
Reply to All = Everyone on the list

I'm not a vendor, but I do correspond off of the list once in awhile.

Sorry Ray, email came back trying to send just to you--- (What's your
contact info?)

Regards,
Rich

-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of S. Weir
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 7:32 PM
To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: si-list administrivia



Ray,

I prefer things the way that they are.  It seems simple enough to
understand that the reply is to the list, and if a private correspondence
is desired, enter the address by hand.

Regards,

Steve
At 03:20 PM 7/24/01 -0700, you wrote:


>I'd like to pose a quick question to the list membership.
>
>There has been a bit of discussion (both today and in the past) regarding
>the function of the "Reply To:" and "Reply To All:" functions on si-list.
>
>A. Present Functionality is:
>
>         "Reply To:" sends a message back to the list.          (which I
> personally like)
>         "Reply To All:" sends two messages back to the list    (which is
> pretty useless)
>
>
>B. We can easily implement alternate functionality:
>
>
>         "Reply To:" sends a message back to the sender.
>         "Reply To All:" sends a message to both the sender and the list.
>
>
>I've been kind of resisting changing anything as I remember the confusion
that
>ensued the last time we toyed with this a couple years ago, but perhaps it
>is time to make things work 'right' whatever that is.
>
>
>I'm soliciting comments: Do you prefer mode "A" (the way it presently is)
>or mode "B"
>(the alternate functionality) ?
>
>Please reply directly to me rather than to the list (to enhance the
>technical signal to
>noise ratio on the list). After I gather a reasonable number of opinions
>I'll summarize
>the responses and modify (or not) the way the REPLY function works on list
>messages.
>
>-Ray Anderson
>Sun Microsystems Inc.
>
>Staff SI Engineer & (si-list admin)
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from si-list:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>For help:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>List archives are viewable at:
>                 http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>or at our remote archives:
>                 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>                 http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List archives are viewable at:
                http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu


------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List archives are viewable at:     
                http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu

Other related posts: