Sainath, As Thomas pointed out, inductance is the ratio of magnetic flux to current in the conductor. Magnetic flux is the integral of B dot dA, or the magnetic field [dot product] the surface you are integrating over. The "dot product" is the same as multiplying the B-field by the area by the cosine of the angle between the B-vector and the normal to the area. So if the B-vector is perpendicular to the area surface, then the B-vector is parallel to the unit normal vector of the area surface, cosine of this zero degree angle is 1, and you simply multiply B*area. Here's an example to illustrate. You have a rectangular metal trace over a ground plane, length in the z-direction, height in the y, width in the x. Stretch a rectangle in the yz plane between the trace and the ground plane. Make it any length (smaller if you are simulating with EM tool). If we assume perfect conductors (ie no internal-conductor magnetic fields), then all of the magnetic field associated with that signal trace will pass through this rectangle. It is kind of like a net. Magnetic field lines always have to end up in the same place they started, completing the circle. Also, in this configuration, all your field lines are perpendicular to the integrating rectangle. So inductance is flux/I = B*A/I. In this case, you will actually have inductance per unit length because your net had a specific z-length. If you were to put your integrating surface on the other side of the trace, extending up from the top of the trace, you theoretically would have to make the area of the surface extend to infinity to "catch" all the field lines. By placing it between the signal line and the return path, you capture all the field lines. So you have one number for inductance if you account for all the B field lines. An inductance "distribution" would indicate that you are not catching all the magnetic field lines with your integrating surface. This might open up a talk about internal inductance, when you have magnetic field lines (ie current) INSIDE the conductors. As frequency increases, the current crowds to the surface, and the internal inductance diminishes. But at lower or intermediate frequencies, this internal inductance can be a contributing factor. For PCB's, this is typically in the low MHz range. But for square conductors on silicon, measuring a few microns wide and a few microns high, the internal inductance might have to be considered up to several GHz. Does this affect you? Do you electrical models consider this effect? How about internal inductance of the ground plane? Interesting stuff here. Salud, Andy Byers -----Original Message----- From: Sainath Nimmagadda [mailto:gigabit@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:25 AM To: beneken@xxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; gigabit@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: si-list Digest V3 #194 Thomas, Thank you. I agree, you get one value of inductance for one integration. If you repeat this for a number of 'concentric spheres', you will get a number of inductances- ranging from minimum to maximum. Does that make sense? Sainath ---------Included Message---------- >Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:04:57 +0200 >From: "Thomas Beneken" <beneken@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >Reply-To: <beneken@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >To: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: si-list Digest V3 #194 > >Hello Sainath, > >inductance is the proportional factor between the current and the magnetic >flux. So far Your idea is ok. But calculating magnetic flux from magnetic >field requires an integration across a closed surface surrounding the >conductor carrying the current. So - as You see - You will not get a >inductance distribution over conductor length but only an integral value for >the conductor enclosed in the chosen sphere. > >Sorry, >Thomas > >> Msg: #12 in digest >> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:55:35 -0800 >> From: "Sainath Nimmagadda" <gigabit@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: [SI-LIST] Microstrip Inductance >> >> Hello experts: >> >> For a microstrip, we know the magnetic field distribution(for >> example, >> Fig. 2.3 Stephen Hall's book) and current density >> distribution(Fig. 4.5 >> same book). Given these, how would you obtain the inductance >> distribution? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Sainath > > >------------------------------------------------------------------ >To unsubscribe from si-list: >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > >or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > >For help: >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > >List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > ---------End of Included Message---------- _____________________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu