[SI-LIST] Re: SDRAM bus termination
- From: "San Miguel, Shane" <shane.san.miguel@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Raj, Shankar" <Shankar.Raj@xxxxxxx>, <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 07:58:00 -0700
Raj,
The termination to 1.25V is needed on a mother board type bus for a lot =
of reasons, one being to dampen reflections. Typical trace length for a =
desktop PC is probably 8-11" (this is just a way ballpark figure) with =
multiple DRAMs on the channel (could be as high as 18 DRAMs per DIMM =
times 2-4DIMMs). You're talking about a distance of 3-5" with only two =
DRAMs on the bus (I am assuming a physical stacked DRAM arrangement). I =
would say to check Howard Johnson's book about the wavelength versus bus =
length and I bet the results would be more favorable for your =
short/light bus than for the long/heavy motherboard bus. Also it helps =
to think of the loading difference between your bus and the long/heavy =
bus as in a motherboard environment. Your bus is more like a video card =
and DDR is used very successfully in that app in a point to point config =
such as you are suggesting. =20
We can talk offline if you like, no need to bug the list. I don't =
pretend to be expert to the level of some on this list but I'll tell you =
everything I know if you wanna ask.
Shane San Miguel=20
Product Engineer=20
Platform Memory Operations=20
Intel Corporation=20
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: Raj, Shankar [mailto:Shankar.Raj@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 9:57 PM
To: San Miguel, Shane; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] Re: SDRAM bus termination
Hi Shane,
I am having point-to-point data interconnections between chipset and =
stacked
DDR's(SSTL2). The length varies from 3 - 5 inches and there is no =
parallel
termination to 1.25V. The signal quality and timings are fine wrt
simulation, but I would like to know whether there are any implcations =
of
not using a parallel termination to 1.25V. I read your mail, but =
couldn't
understand clearly. It will be of great help if u can explain the same.
Thanks and Regards,
Shankar V
Force Computers
Bangalore
-----Original Message-----
From: San Miguel, Shane [mailto:shane.san.miguel@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 April 2003 1:34 AM
To: ganesancp@xxxxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: SDRAM bus termination
The SDRAM stuff will work fine in point to point config as long as the =
=3D
data bus is short. Shouldn't be a concern even though SSTL specs =3D
specify a high-z state. I have no knowledge of the FPGA side of your =
=3D
situation but as long as it doesn't use the DQS preamble/postamble to =
=3D
set up any data window timings you'll be fine. You can't do the =3D
preamble/postamble with point to point. I've seen point to point SDRAM =
=3D
and DDR DRAM on testers using FPGAs and point to point with no issues. =
=3D
Without termination there WILL BE a charge up time for the data bus, 1 =
=3D
or two bits worth maybe, depends. You'll see this represented as the =
=3D
high/low swing gradually rising in DC level over a couple of successive =
=3D
reads (or bits). As long as you know this is happening it shouldn't be =
=3D
an issue.
Shane San Miguel=3D20
Product Engineer=3D20
Platform Memory Operations=3D20
Intel Corporation=3D20
=3D20
=3D20
-----Original Message-----
From: ganesancp [mailto:ganesancp@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 9:33 AM
To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] SDRAM bus termination
Hello SI experts,
I am designing a board with one SDR SDRAM and i want to connect =
this=3D20
SDRAM to a Xilinx Virtex-E FPGA in another board. SDRAM interface=3D20
will be working at 120MHz and there is no other component in the =
bus=3D20
(point-to-point).=3D20
Any termination suggested for the data bus and any other SI related=3D20
issues expected in this configuration?
Regards,
Ganesan
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at: =3D20
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages=3D20
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
=3D20
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at: =20
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages=20
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
=20
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts: