This response addresses a couple of mini-threads that started with the original posting: 1. Frequencies greater than 1 GHz are perfectly fine to run on FR4(-6) material and we have done a number of 2GHz designs with FR4. As in many areas of design, the criteria for use depends on your application. =20 2. When trying to determine the Er (vs. frequency) of the material for use in simulation, the best method is to ask your fab house unless you are dealing with a specific manufacturer like Nelco. Either way, the fab house will have this information as it relates to the manufacturers they regularly use. -Chris=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Fasig, Jonathan L. [mailto:fasig.jonathan@xxxxxxxx]=20 > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:14 AM > To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Dielectric constant for FR4 at above=20 > 1Ghz frequency >=20 >=20 > For what it's worth, Nelco has nice tables of dielectric constant at=20 > 1MHz, 1GHz, 2.5GHz and 10GHz for several laminated thicknesses along=20 > with the constructions (e.g. 2 layers of 2116). Reference=20 > the tables at=20 > http://www.parknelco.com/parknelco/resources.htm and take the=20 > link for "Typical Dielectric Property Tables". You will need=20 > to register for a=20 > password first. >=20 > Isola has some similar information for their FR406 and FR408=20 > products at=20 > http://www.isolalaminatesystems.com/isolaus.nsf/main?OpenFrame > set . See the spreadsheets under Processing Guide for the=20 > respective laminates. >=20 > jf > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- >=20 > Jonathan Fasig Email: fasig.jonathan@xxxxxxxx=09 > Mayo Foundation=20 > 4001 41st Street NW=20 > MSC Sn 2-132 Phone: (507) 538-5464 > Rochester, MN 55901 Fax: (507) 284-9171 >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: David Hoover [mailto:dhoovy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]=20 > Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 10:46 PM > To: alexh1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Dielectric constant for FR4 at above=20 > 1Ghz frequency >=20 >=20 > Alex, (it's been awhile) (below is my $.02 from a fabricator) >=20 > In the case of FR-4 we typically see a series of variables > that gives us the PCB dielectric properties. > For example: >=20 > If we look at the 5 most common (E-Glass) fiberglass styles=20 > used in the > U.S.: 1060, 1080, 2113, 2116, and 7628 These yield different=20 > thicknesses within the PCB. The 1060 yields the thinnest all=20 > the way up to the 7628 which is (one of ) the thickest. The=20 > Dk of the pure resin of FR-4 epoxy is ~3.6 and the pure=20 > (E-glass) fiberglass is ~6.6 (@ 1 MHz . That's all I've found=20 > on the raw materials so far). It's the resin to glass ratio=20 > that gives us the variance. >=20 > We typically find: > Prepreg Thickness Resin Er > Style Percentage (@ 1 GHz) > 1060 ~.002" 69 3.63 > 1080 ~.003" 62 3.80 > 2113 ~.004" 55 4.00 > 2116 ~.005" 52 4.08 > 7628 ~.007" 45 4.32 >=20 > Those values above are used to manufacture the various FR-4=20 > cores. Each is basically like a building block used to=20 > achieve various thicknesses. The thinner ones typically cost=20 > more than the thicker ones. Some PCB fab shops or OEMs have=20 > rules where they require the use of two plys minimum. A key=20 > note to bring up is that even though the 1060 has the lowest=20 > Er, it would not be a good idea to build an entire PCB out of=20 > that prepreg. The resin content is too high and the pressed=20 > PCB would flow resin all over the edges of the lamination=20 > templates onto the lamination press. The thinner > material(s) also has the greatest amount of dimensional=20 > movement within the PCB. An entire PCB built of 1060 would=20 > cost alot and would experience large amounts of material=20 > shrinkage when pressed. For cost and dimensional movement=20 > reasons we minimize the amount of plies by choosing those=20 > different styles of prepreg to build the various dielectric=20 > thickness. (This allows the pad to hole ratio used today to=20 > be maintained) >=20 > There is beginning to be a few more choices of fiberglass=20 > styles. Nelco has introduced the "SI" style fiberglass which=20 > has a Dk of 4.4. When used to make prepreg, it yields a=20 > substantially lower Er product. If you factor in lower Dk=20 > resin blends (like the "-13") you can achieve a fairly low Er=20 > material (when compared to standard FR-4). >=20 > Hitachi and a few others have blends coming on line that have=20 > fairly low Er values. These are all thermoset materials.=20 > (Meaning they cure into a hard rigid state) The thermoplastic=20 > materials (like PTFE > based) have Er's that get very low but sometimes are very=20 > difficult to build multilayer PCBs with. >=20 > We should start seeing more and more folks starting to test=20 > their materials at various frequencies soon. This is driven=20 > by issues such what Stuart, Andy, and Tom are discussing. >=20 > As far as manipulating resins properties to achieve less=20 > loss, I havn't encountered that yet. I have heard of R and D=20 > efforts by the laminate manufacturers working on this, but I=20 > have not heard of any production ready releases. >=20 > Kind Regards, >=20 > David Hoover > Sr. Field Application Engineer > Multilayer Technology, Inc. >=20 > San Jose, Ca > http://www.multek.com >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alex Horvath" <alexh1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 3:04 PM > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Dielectric constant for FR4 at above=20 > 1Ghz frequency >=20 >=20 > > Exactly, it seems to be fairly common misconception that skin effect > losses always dominate. Dielectric losses are proportional to=20 > frequency, although they start out lower they will always=20 > exceed skin effect losses between 500 and 1Ghz or so. The=20 > biggest factor affecting this seems to the resin content of the PCB. > > > > I'd like to hear more about the properties of the resin, if=20 > it can be > manipulated for less loss and what are the tradeoffs. I=20 > wasn't able to find out much about resin properties on the web. > > > > Thanks > > steve weir <weirsp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Stuart, for common dielectrics, somewhere in the high=20 > hundreds of MHz > > dielectric loss overtakes loss from skin effect. > > > > Steve. > > At 05:16 PM 11/24/2003 -0500, Stuart Brorson wrote: > > >True enough, but aren't the dielectric losses in FR-4 more or less > > >frequency independent (i.e. to the <10% level that the dielectric=20 > > >function is constant)? > > > > > >Anyway, Tom is right: you need to consider the frequency=20 > variation of > > >both Dk (the dielectric function) and Df (the dielectric loss=20 > > >function). However, both are typically dominated by skin effect=20 > > >losses, particular in the GHz range. > > > > > >Stuart > > > > > > > > > > To make the answer complete you need also to include dielectric > > > > losses > > > which > > > > also are frequency dependent. > > > > > > > > Tom Dagostino > > > > Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC Teraspeed Consulting=20 > Group LLC 2926 > > > > SE Yamhill St. Device Modeling Division Portland, OR=20 > 97214 13610=20 > > > > SW Harness Lane Beaverton, OR 97008 > > > > http://www.teraspeed.com 503-430-1065 > > > > tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Stuart Brorson > > > > Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 1:22 PM > > > > To: andyk@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Dielectric constant for FR4 at=20 > above 1Ghz=20 > > > > frequency > > > > > > > > > > > > If I am not mistaken, your question is equivalent to=20 > this one: Is > > > > the dielectric function constant over the 1 MHz -- 1 GHz range?=20 > > > > The answer is: It is not constant, but varies by=20 > several percent=20 > > > > or more over that range for many FR-4s. (FR-4 is not a single=20 > > > > material, but is a family of materials, each different=20 > depending=20 > > > > upon your PCB vendor, and whatever batch of materials he was=20 > > > > shipped on any particular day.) > > > > > > > > However, the bigger problem for you to think about is=20 > the loss due > > > > to the skin effect in your copper traces. The skin=20 > effect losses=20 > > > > vary as the square root of the frequency, IIRC. The=20 > > > > frequency-dependent loss due to the skin effect=20 > dominates over the=20 > > > > frequency variation of the FR-4's dielectric constant. > > > > > > > > Here are some references: > > > > > > > > http://www.tdasystems.com/library/appnotes/siml0803.pdf > > > > http://signalintegrity.com/Pubs%5Cnews%5C4_5.htm > > > > > > > > Stuart > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > I am designing a high speed PCB at over 1Ghz=20 > frequency using FR4 > > > material=3D > > > > > . > > > > > I am wondering how much the dielectric constant will=20 > be affected > > > > > by > the > > > > > frequency over 1Ghz as compared to 1Mhz? > > > > > > > > > > Thank you > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Andy > > >------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >To unsubscribe from si-list: > > >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the=20 > Subject field > > > > > >or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > > >//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > > > > >For help: > > >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > > > >List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org > > > > > >List archives are viewable at: > > >//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > >or at our remote archives: =20 > > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > > >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: =20 > > >http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from si-list: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the=20 > Subject field > > > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:=20 > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > > > For help: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > > List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org > > > > List archives are viewable at:=20 > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > or at our remote archives:=20 > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:=20 > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from si-list: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the=20 > Subject field > > > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:=20 > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > > > For help: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > > List technical documents are available at: > > http://www.si-list.org > > > > List archives are viewable at:=20 > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > or at our remote archives:=20 > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >=20 > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >=20 > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >=20 > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.org >=20 > List archives are viewable at: =20 > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages=20 > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > =20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >=20 > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >=20 > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >=20 > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.org >=20 > List archives are viewable at: =20 > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages=20 > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > =20 >=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu