[SI-LIST] Re: Dielectric constant for FR4 at above 1Ghz frequency

I agree, an excellent posting David, thank you.

I wonder if any vendors are using other laminates besides E-glass.
I've experiments with "structural" S-glass. The glass yields a
stronger lamination with a tighter weave. What about Kevlar?

I don't have numbers for these other laminates. Does anyone else
on the list?

---
mkp=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Cantrell [mailto:Ken.Cantrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Nice posting.

-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of David Hoover
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 9:46 PM
Alex, (it's been awhile) (below is my $.02 from a fabricator)

In the case of FR-4 we typically see a series of variables
that gives us the PCB dielectric properties.
For example:

If we look at the 5 most common (E-Glass) fiberglass styles
used in the U.S.: 1060, 1080, 2113, 2116, and 7628
These yield different thicknesses within the PCB. The 1060
yields the thinnest all the way up to the 7628 which is (one of )
the thickest. The Dk of the pure resin of FR-4 epoxy is ~3.6
and the pure (E-glass) fiberglass is ~6.6 (@ 1 MHz . That's
all I've found on the raw materials so far). It's the resin to glass
ratio that gives us the variance.

We typically find:
Prepreg        Thickness    Resin                Er
  Style                           Percentage     (@ 1 GHz)
1060             ~.002"           69                3.63
1080             ~.003"           62                3.80
2113             ~.004"           55                4.00
2116             ~.005"           52                4.08
7628             ~.007"           45                4.32

Those values above are used to manufacture the various FR-4
cores. Each is basically like a building block used to achieve
various thicknesses. The thinner ones typically cost more than
the thicker ones. Some PCB fab shops or OEMs have rules
where they require the use of two plys minimum. A key note
to bring up is that even though the 1060 has the lowest Er, it
would not be a good idea to build an entire PCB out of that
prepreg. The resin content is too high and the pressed PCB
would flow resin all over the edges of the lamination templates
onto the lamination press. The thinner material(s) also has the
greatest amount of dimensional movement within the PCB.
An entire PCB built of 1060 would cost alot and would
experience large amounts of material shrinkage when pressed.
For cost and dimensional movement reasons we minimize
the amount of plies by choosing those different styles of
prepreg to build the various dielectric thickness.
(This allows the pad to hole ratio used today to be maintained)

There is beginning to be a few more choices of fiberglass styles.
Nelco has introduced the "SI" style fiberglass which has a Dk
of 4.4. When used to make prepreg, it yields a substantially
lower Er product. If you factor in lower Dk resin blends
(like the "-13") you can achieve a fairly low Er material
(when compared to standard FR-4).

Hitachi and a few others have blends coming on line that have fairly
low Er values. These are all thermoset materials. (Meaning they
cure into a hard rigid state) The thermoplastic materials (like PTFE
based) have Er's that get very low but sometimes are very difficult
to build multilayer PCBs with.

We should start seeing more and more folks starting to test their
materials at various frequencies soon. This is driven by issues such
what Stuart, Andy, and Tom are discussing.

As far as manipulating resins properties to achieve less loss, I havn't
encountered that yet. I have heard of R and D efforts by the laminate
manufacturers working on this, but I have not heard of any production
ready releases.

Kind Regards,

David Hoover
Sr. Field Application Engineer
Multilayer Technology, Inc.

San Jose, Ca
http://www.multek.com



------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.org

List archives are viewable at:     
                http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: