[SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: Scott McMorrow <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: jeff.loyer@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:11:26 -0400
Surface roughness is the largest contributor we've measured for
conductor loss. There are certain low loss materials that are
constructed with high tooth copper for maximum adhesion, which show
enough loss to absolutely negate any benefit that the low loss (low tan
delta) material would have had over materials with twice the dielectric
loss.
Interesting stuff.
Scott McMorrow
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
121 North River Drive
Narragansett, RI 02882
(401) 284-1827 Business
(401) 284-1840 Fax
http://www.teraspeed.com
Teraspeed® is the registered service mark of
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
Loyer, Jeff wrote:
> My 2 cents available in the article below:
>
> http://pcdandm.com/cms/content/view/2572/95/
>
>
> Jeff Loyer
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of M Sridhar
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 5:08 AM
> To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [SI-LIST] Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
>
> Hi Members,
>
> What are the methods by which we can reduce the conductor losses at high
> frequency?(Loss due to skin effect, Dielectric losses etc.)
> Which is the best conductor at higher frequency? in the range of 1-5 GHz
>
> Thanks,
> Sridhar
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.net
>
> List archives are viewable at: =20
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> =20
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.net
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- Follow-Ups:
- [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: Eric Bogatin
- [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: Tom Biggs
- References:
- [SI-LIST] Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: M Sridhar
- [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: Loyer, Jeff
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: Eric Bogatin
- [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: Tom Biggs
- [SI-LIST] Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: M Sridhar
- [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: Loyer, Jeff