[SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: tbiggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:40:06 -0700
Tom, for geometries in typical use this does not seem to be a
significant contributor to EMI. Where it might start to become an issue
is if we were to do something foolish like run a big fat trace over
thick dielectric close to and parallel to a board edge. That would make
a nice antenna that both emits noise and welcomes ESD with open arms.
Regards,
Steve.
Tom Biggs wrote:
> From: steve weir
> " EMI issues from microstrip are often greatly overstated. The big
> offenders on a PCB are: the cavity edges, and the components radiating
> above the PCB surface. Doug Smith has some good information on these
> types of subjects. Lee is passionate about his practical experience
> with M/S and no significant EMI issues."
>
> I was thinking more about the effect of making the surface trace wider
> (for lower loss) and further away from the ground plane. I assume that
> this increases EMI even though the impedence isn't changing.
>
> -tom
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.net
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
>
>
--
Steve Weir
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
121 North River Drive
Narragansett, RI 02882
California office
(408) 884-3985 Business
(707) 780-1951 Fax
Main office
(401) 284-1827 Business
(401) 284-1840 Fax
Oregon office
(503) 430-1065 Business
(503) 430-1285 Fax
http://www.teraspeed.com
This e-mail contains proprietary and confidential intellectual property of
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Teraspeed(R) is the registered service mark of Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- References:
- [SI-LIST] Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: M Sridhar
- [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: Loyer, Jeff
- [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: Scott McMorrow
- [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: Tom Biggs
- [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: steve weir
- [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: Tom Biggs
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- [SI-LIST] Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: M Sridhar
- [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: Loyer, Jeff
- [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: Scott McMorrow
- [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: Tom Biggs
- [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: steve weir
- [SI-LIST] Re: Conductor loss reduction at High Frequency
- From: Tom Biggs