Hello, me again ... some short comments on my previous post: Of course if you do not use a full 3D Field solver you need a special needle modeling. I could imagine, that the Bondwire models in Momentum could allow a nice modeling .. Of course VDD/VSS is also to be considered, as this could cause also some noise with some specific activation cycles (also I doubt that DDR2 with e. g. 533MHz for DDR2-1066 can stimulate a 1GHz resonance on VDDQ or VDD) Hermann Our next Events: ================ Signal Ingegrity Seminar "Open the Black Box of Signal Integrity" at TH Aalen on 29th October 2011 Visit us on Embedded World 2012 Our location Hall 1 / Booth 509 Check our website or contact us for details EKH - EyeKnowHow Hermann Ruckerbauer www.EyeKnowHow.de Hermann.Ruckerbauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Veilchenstrasse 1 94554 Moos Tel.: +49 (0)9938 / 902 083 Mobile: +49 (0)176 / 787 787 77 Fax: +49 (0)3212 / 121 9008 schrieb Hermann Ruckerbauer: > Hello, > > just as short feedback to Ravva's answer: > > 1) The die capacitance(C_Comp) in the IBIS is the parasitic input > capacitance due to ESD, routing, Driver, Receiver .. > It is NOT the decoupling capacitor between VDDQ and VSSQ! > > 4) I agree that a full 3D solve is too big for the system I'm expecting. > There are other tools out that will do this job better. As ADS user I > would give Momentum a try .. > > > Hermann > > Our next Events: > ================ > > Signal Ingegrity Seminar "Open the Black Box of Signal Integrity" > at TH Aalen on 29th October 2011 > > Visit us on Embedded World 2012 > Our location Hall 1 / Booth 509 > > Check our website or contact us for details > > EKH - EyeKnowHow > Hermann Ruckerbauer > www.EyeKnowHow.de > Hermann.Ruckerbauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Veilchenstrasse 1 > 94554 Moos > Tel.: +49 (0)9938 / 902 083 > Mobile: +49 (0)176 / 787 787 77 > Fax: +49 (0)3212 / 121 9008 > > > schrieb Poorna Chander Ravva: >> Hi Cris, >> 1. As far as I know the IBIS model should include the one die capacitance >> >> 2. May be you can just confirm with the silicon vendor >> >> 3. Also the frequency range of the anti resonance for your PDN is >> important. If the resonance is generally around 1GHz range, then it might >> be contributed because of the lack of the on die capacitance.. if the >> resonance is much much lower in frequency it is contributed by either the >> lack of your package capacitance (since you did not include that anyway) >> and or board capacitance >> >> 4. Regarding the HFSS simulation: if you are generating your whole power >> delivery network model in HFSS it would be very difficult to solve. I >> would use tools like PowerSI or Ansoft SIwave to generate the PDN models >> and then incorporate the connector models from the HFSS into your final >> SSN SPICE simulation... >> >> Thanks, >> PoornaChander Ravva >> >> >>> Hi folks >>> >>> thanks for your feedback. >>> I had to reduce the number of power pins in HFSS simulation otherwise the >>> full 3D model with all power pins was to huge to simulate. >>> >>> So I reduced 46 pwr needles of I/O pwr to only 6 around of my total 10 I/O >>> I'm simulating for SSN. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Cris >>> Inviati dal mio telefono Nokia >>> ----Messaggio Originale---- >>> Da: Michael Greim >>> Inviati: 16/10/2011, 15:13 >>> A: steve weir >>> Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Oggetto: [SI-LIST] Re: Chip capacitance effect for SSN simulation >>> >>> >>> Great points Steve (as always). Cristian, a simulation >>> is only as good as its ability to properly mirror the actual >>> correlated test setup. As you strip this that and the other >>> thing out, the sim and the hardware behavior will become very >>> different from one another. Set up some test cases with >>> your queries and see if the behaviors are convergent or >>> divergent. >>> Why did you "have to" reduce the number of power pins? >>> >>> Build up a better relationship with your vendor and tell them >>> what you are looking for and why and you might be quite >>> surprised what they give you. Perhaps even an RLC matrix >>> or two and with a story relating of other customers who have >>> run into similar issues. >>> >>> Check out my quote from Mr fleischmann below. Works >>> great for a number of things in real life and the simulated >>> behavior thereof including SI/PI sims......... >>> >>> -Michael. >>> >>> We will either find a way or make one -Hannibal >>> >>> In the middle of every difficulty lies opportunity -Al Einstein >>> >>> If you're not getting the results you want with the >>> current approach, move on and try something else. -A. Fleischmann >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 5:39 AM, steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> You need a model of the silicon that includes the on-die capacitance. >>>> You can try to obtain this, or if it is not available, then derive it >>>> from measurements. The complexity of the model that you construct >>>> depends on how much accuracy you need. You will still face the same >>>> challengess as others in the ATE business when dealing with the parallel >>>> bus structure of DRAM switching with very small rise and fall times, and >>>> the inductance of your probing interconnects. >>>> >>>> Steve. >>>> >>>> On 10/16/2011 2:25 AM, Cristian Gozzi wrote: >>>>> Hi SI members >>>>> I'm simulating DDR2 SSN for a Probe Card system >>>>> >>>>> for those that are not familiar with this application, Probe Card is >>>> an >>>>> hardware application to physical connect DIE pads/bumps at wafer level >>>> to >>>>> ATE system during Electric Wafer Sort >>>>> In my case Probe-Card is build by a vertical needles that touch DIE >>>> pads >>>> + >>>>> PCB >>>>> >>>>> During frequency domain analysis of my system, I got a strong PDN peak >>>>> impedance around 1GHz >>>>> This peak impedance was due to anti-resonance effect between PCB PDN >>>> system >>>>> and needle PWR parasitic effect >>>>> >>>>> so during time domain analysis I got a strong and unreasonable AC >>>> noises >>>>> also with only 2 switching DQ >>>>> >>>>> In my spice deck I only used IBIS model provided by silicon vendor and >>>> I >>>>> excluded RLC package effects, since my application is contacting >>>> directly >>>>> wafer. >>>>> >>>>> I think I should include chip power rail capacitance effect in order >>>> to >>>>> filter high freq noises. >>>>> >>>>> But my question is: which C and R value should I use? >>>>> >>>>> Is these value included in IBIS model? >>>>> >>>>> NOTE: consider that I had to reduce number of PWR needles used for >>>> HFSS >>>>> simulation, so I only selected those needles around my 8 DQ + 2 DQS >>>>> >>>>> So I think I should put a lower value of chip capacitance than total >>>> one >>>>> Any comments from expert are more than welcome >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Cris >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> To unsubscribe from si-list: >>>>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >>>>> >>>>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>>>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >>>>> >>>>> For help: >>>>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> List technical documents are available at: >>>>> http://www.si-list.net >>>>> >>>>> List archives are viewable at: >>>>> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>>>> >>>>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>>>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Steve Weir >>>> IPBLOX, LLC >>>> 150 N. Center St. #211 >>>> Reno, NV 89501 >>>> www.ipblox.com >>>> >>>> (775) 299-4236 Business >>>> (866) 675-4630 Toll-free >>>> (707) 780-1951 Fax >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> To unsubscribe from si-list: >>>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >>>> >>>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >>>> >>>> For help: >>>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >>>> >>>> >>>> List technical documents are available at: >>>> http://www.si-list.net >>>> >>>> List archives are viewable at: >>>> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>>> >>>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> To unsubscribe from si-list: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >>> >>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >>> >>> For help: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >>> >>> >>> List technical documents are available at: >>> http://www.si-list.net >>> >>> List archives are viewable at: >>> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>> >>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> To unsubscribe from si-list: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >>> >>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >>> >>> For help: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >>> >>> >>> List technical documents are available at: >>> http://www.si-list.net >>> >>> List archives are viewable at: >>> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>> >>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>> >>> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> To unsubscribe from si-list: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >> >> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >> >> For help: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >> >> >> List technical documents are available at: >> http://www.si-list.net >> >> List archives are viewable at: >> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >> >> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu