You make interesting points, but as I said before, I'm not going to fill up everyone's inbox who isn't interested in this discussion. I don't want to reply to your no-reply email without knowing if it is your real email haha. -Nick P.S. I'm still not convinced I don't want to see it =) On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Paul <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have to disagree with Mr. Wiseman on whether "The Principle" is > controversial or not. It isn't controversial at all. You don't get to > claim something is controversial just because a bunch of folks with no > understanding of basic science insist something is wrong. > > This movie is on par with "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed." Is there > controversy among astronomers regarding heliocentrism? No. The > heliocentric model is far less controversial than the acceptance among > climate scientists that increasing carbon dioxide is primarily responsible > for global warming (97%). > > Galileo Galilei laid this matter to rest with his publication of "Dialogue > Concerning the Two Chief World Systems," (which I can loan to anyone who > would like to read it--English version--not the original Italian) 382 years > ago. To promote geocentrism over heliocentrism is to rescind Newton's > theory of gravity, which has served us all so well these past three hundred > years. > > > Here is a Scientific American article on "the Axis of Evil" mentioned in > the YouTube video (radio program) to which Alan linked. I find no evidence > this axis is aligned towards our local group, much less us--if it were we > would have a lot more trouble seeing it just as we have trouble discerning > the shape of the Milky Way because we are in it. I confess I could not sit > through the entire program. Maybe he wasn't actually defending > geocentrism, and maybe there was some better point further along--strong > anthropic principle, anyone? > > http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/universal-alignment/ > > I really liked the Slate take on this "controversy" written by the "bad > astronomy" guy Phil Plait. > > > http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2014/04/08/the_principle_a_documentary_about_geocentrism.html > > In other news we'll all be floating (again) come January 4th, the "zero > gravity" day (due to the alignment of Jupiter and the all-powerful Pluto). > > http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2014/12/24/zero_g_day_nope.html > > > > > Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo > > > -------------------------------------------- > On Sun, 12/28/14, Nicholas Wiseman <njtwiseman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Subject: [SAS] Interesting documentary > To: sas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Sunday, December 28, 2014, 3:16 PM > > So a new cosmology > documentary "The Principle" that's played in > one theater in Chicago already has a smallish following here > in Spokane/Post Falls. I know of a number of people who > are trying to bring it to AMC in Spokane on the 23rd of > January (First potential showing). Further details to > follow if anyone shows interest. http://www.theprinciplemovie.com/ > It is very controversial and I, personally, am > very interested in seeing it myself. I was wondering if > anyone would like to "claim" a ticket. > They're about $10 (give or take a bit) if enough > tickets are sold. Otherwise, no money will change > hands. > I thought I'd let the list know to see if > anyone else would be interested. The theater needs to see > that 500 tickets have been sold in order for the movie to > air. I think close to 400 have been accounted > for. > The only thing I'm getting out of this is the > ability to see the movie, I'm not trying to sell > anything for personal gain, it's entirely non-profit and > for the love of the science behind what we do as amateurs. > > I'd also not like to get in a huge debate on > the list about the content, if you want to talk about it I > think we should keep them, should they follow, on a personal > e-mail basis, I don't think that would be proper to talk > about controversial science on a stargazing > list. > So let me know if your interested or want more > information. Again, I'd only like to see it and we > need more tickets sold to be able to. Check it out, let me > know, Also I hope I'm not overstepping the list here, > if I am I'll be more than happy to not talk about it > again > -Thanks!Nick W. > >