I do know about this controversy and yet I still want to see what case they have for something so seemingly outrageous. On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Dale Nichols <newdenver@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Wikpedia has an entry for this film that is worth checking before buying a > ticket. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Principle > > Dale Nichols > > On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Nicholas Wiseman <njtwiseman@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> So a new cosmology documentary "The Principle" that's played in one >> theater in Chicago already has a smallish following here in Spokane/Post >> Falls. I know of a number of people who are trying to bring it to AMC in >> Spokane on the 23rd of January (First potential showing). Further details >> to follow if anyone shows interest. http://www.theprinciplemovie.com/ >> >> It is very controversial and I, personally, am very interested in seeing >> it myself. I was wondering if anyone would like to "claim" a ticket. >> They're about $10 (give or take a bit) *if enough tickets are sold*. >> Otherwise, no money will change hands. >> >> I thought I'd let the list know to see if anyone else would be >> interested. The theater needs to see that 500 tickets have been sold in >> order for the movie to air. I think close to 400 have been accounted for. >> >> The only thing I'm getting out of this is the ability to see the movie, >> I'm not trying to sell anything for personal gain, it's entirely non-profit >> and for the love of the science behind what we do as amateurs. >> >> I'd also not like to get in a huge debate on the list about the content, >> if you want to talk about it I think we should keep them, should they >> follow, on a personal e-mail basis, I don't think that would be proper to >> talk about controversial science on a stargazing list. >> >> So let me know if your interested or want more information. Again, I'd >> only like to see it and we need more tickets sold to be able to. Check it >> out, let me know, Also I hope I'm not overstepping the list here, if I am >> I'll be more than happy to not talk about it again >> >> -Thanks! >> Nick W. >> > >