[rollei_list] Re: looks like ... agfa Sala
- From: "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 12:08:49 -0700
I found that the bulbs I need are M type. The M means miniature. Not
as small as the AG type but they are smaller than the standard
flashbulbs.
Cress Photo lists them as M2 and M25.=20
On 5/30/05, Eric Goldstein <egoldste@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This will be helpful to your Richard:
>=20
> http://www.dr5.com/faqprint.html
>=20
>=20
> Eric Goldstein
>=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Knoppow <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: May 30, 2005 11:19 AM
> To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [rollei_list] Re: looks like ... agfa Sala
>=20
>=20
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric Goldstein" <egoldste@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 8:26 AM
> Subject: [rollei_list] Re: looks like ... agfa Sala
>=20
>=20
> > Also remember that you do not have the base fog to deal
> > with on films speci=3D
> > fically meant to be reverse processed. I don't believe
> > there is another b/w=3D
> > film out there that is clear based...
> >
> > Eric Goldstein
> >
> >
> I haven't used any Agfa B&W film in 35mm so I don't know
> directly. The data sheet shows an anti-halation layer under
> the emulsion rather than as a back coating, an arrangement
> common on color films. Locating the layer there eliminates
> the need for the anti-light-piping pigment in the support. I
> wonder if Agfa coats these films on a clear support. Of
> course, if Agfa dies this won't be helpful.
> I have never seen anything in the literature about the
> differences in the emulsion between a regular negative film
> and one meant for reversal. I suspect there are such
> differences. Except for reversal laboratory materials
> intended to make direct copies of negatives reversal films
> are generally intended for viewing by projection. That
> requires considerably higher contrast and maximum density
> than is usual for negatives. A specific curve shape may also
> be desirable. While many negative materials seem to be
> capable of successful reversal a specialized material is
> likely to give either better results or be less fussy in
> processing or both.
>=20
> ---
> Richard Knoppow
> Los Angeles, CA, USA
> dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> ---
> Rollei List
>=20
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>=20
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>=20
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>=20
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>=20
>=20
> ---
> Rollei List
>=20
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>=20
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>=20
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>=20
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>=20
>=20
--=20
Peter K
=D3=BF=D5=AC
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
