[rollei_list] Re: Rolleiflex 2.8C Film Frame

  • From: Carlos Manuel Freaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 22:37:40 -0300 (ART)

No Elias, it's the lower roller reflection, when the
light enters into the camera for the exposure, due to
some reason and for some cameras the light reaches the
lower roller projecting the reflection for the next
frame, since the image is upside, the brightest image
part is down and the darkest part up (for most cases),
the roller receiving the excessive light is the lower
roller, the light comes from the brightest part of the
image being exposed reaching the lower roller that
projects this reflection to the fram waiting to be
exposed, upper roller has nothing to do.
We discussed this issue along two years writing
thousands and thousands of messages in other forum, we
also had Claus Prochnow, Todd Belcher, Dieter Paepke
from Dusseldorf opinions, however their explanations
were not enough and exact about the problem, Prochnow
finally said it needed a camera with the problem to
overhaul it, but he was ill and could not do the work.

Other users having cameras with the roller reflection
issue had partial success filling the lower gap,
anyway the problem did no disappear. As I wrote this
morning, I and others never had the problem, anyway I
could obtain a roller reflection with my C
overexposing very much using F 4 and F 2.8, the 3.5F
under similar conditions did not show the roller
reflection.-

Carlos   


--- ERoustom <eroustom@xxxxxxxxxxx> escribió:

> Thanks all for your input.
> 
> Carlos the image is upside down to the film no? So
> the top is where  
> the problem is.
> 
> I was thinking of filling the gap with something...
> I can live with  
> it of course, but if I did fill it, I wonder what
> I'd use. I was  
> thinking about some sort of foam.
> 
> Anyhow... thanks.
> 
> E.
> 
> 
> On May 29, 2008, at 2:25 PM, Richard Knoppow wrote:
> 
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Wild"
> <JWild@millstream- 
> > hotel.co.uk>
> > To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 10:08 AM
> > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Rolleiflex 2.8C Film
> Frame
> >
> >
> > On my 3.5F, the roller is virtually level with the
> film guides.
> > Logically, the roller would be level to within a
> couple of thou' to
> > prevent the film bending away from the guides as
> it rolls tightly onto
> > the spool. Higher than that and it would lift the
> film off the guides
> > and lower than that, the film could be come
> scratched or kinked as it
> > moves over the guides. There must be a tolerence
> listed somewhere  
> > (in a
> > repair manual?). Are these rollers adjustable by
> shims etc or are
> > different diameter rollers used to suit the height
> of the film guides?
> > The lens would be adjusted for focus on each
> camera so the exact
> > dimension of the film guide to front face of
> casting would not
> > necessarily be that critical. I guess parallelism
> would be more so.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >     There seems to be no adjustment for the roller
> postion. The  
> > brackets that hold them are located by the camera
> body, that is,  
> > you push them in as far as they will go and
> tighten the screws. Of  
> > course, you can tighten the screws with the
> brackets pulled out a  
> > little but then there is nothing to keep them
> parallel so I don't  
> > think this is an intentional adjustment.
> >     All the rollers are the same, that is, there
> may be different  
> > rollers for different models but not a selection
> of diameters for a  
> > given model.
> >     The ends of the film rails should prevent the
> film from  
> > touching the edges of the mask in the film gate.
> Whatever is the  
> > case I have never heard of a Rollei scratching
> film, at least not  
> > one in reasonable repair.
> >
> > ---
> > Richard Knoppow
> > Los Angeles, CA, USA
> > dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Rollei List
> >
> > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with 'subscribe'  
> > in the subject field OR by logging into
> www.freelists.org
> >
> > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with  
> > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging
> into  
> > www.freelists.org
> >
> > - Online, searchable archives are available at
> > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> >
> 
> ---
> Rollei List
> 
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with 'subscribe' 
> in the subject field OR by logging into
> www.freelists.org
> 
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with 
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging
> into www.freelists.org
> 
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Correo Yahoo!
Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis! 
¡Abrí tu cuenta ya! - http://correo.yahoo.com.ar
---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: