[rollei_list] Re: Rolleiflex 2.8C Film Frame

Richard, Dennis and Sanders using original FX black
rollers have the roller reflection sometimes, black
rollers diminishes the reflection but it does not
disappear.-

Carlos
--- Richard Knoppow <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> escribió:

> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Carlos Manuel Freaza" <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 6:37 PM
> Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Rolleiflex 2.8C Film
> Frame
> 
> 
> > No Elias, it's the lower roller reflection, when
> the
> > light enters into the camera for the exposure, due
> to
> > some reason and for some cameras the light reaches
> the
> > lower roller projecting the reflection for the
> next
> > frame, since the image is upside, the brightest
> image
> > part is down and the darkest part up (for most
> cases),
> > the roller receiving the excessive light is the
> lower
> > roller, the light comes from the brightest part of
> the
> > image being exposed reaching the lower roller that
> > projects this reflection to the fram waiting to be
> > exposed, upper roller has nothing to do.
> > We discussed this issue along two years writing
> > thousands and thousands of messages in other
> forum, we
> > also had Claus Prochnow, Todd Belcher, Dieter
> Paepke
> > from Dusseldorf opinions, however their
> explanations
> > were not enough and exact about the problem,
> Prochnow
> > finally said it needed a camera with the problem
> to
> > overhaul it, but he was ill and could not do the
> work.
> >
> > Other users having cameras with the roller
> reflection
> > issue had partial success filling the lower gap,
> > anyway the problem did no disappear. As I wrote
> this
> > morning, I and others never had the problem,
> anyway I
> > could obtain a roller reflection with my C
> > overexposing very much using F 4 and F 2.8, the
> 3.5F
> > under similar conditions did not show the roller
> > reflection.-
> >
> > Carlos
> >
>      I think that when very bright light is at the
> bottom of 
> the frame (top of the image) enough light can
> reflect off 
> the emulsion to be reflected again by the roller. I
> think 
> the real answer to this is to replace the roller
> with a non 
> reflective one. One could try painting the roller
> with 
> Krylon Ultra-Flat Black paint. I don't know if it
> would 
> stick to the polished surface. It would probably
> work for 
> long enough to test the idea.
> 
> ---
> Richard Knoppow
> Los Angeles, CA, USA
> dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> ---
> Rollei List
> 
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with 'subscribe' 
> in the subject field OR by logging into
> www.freelists.org
> 
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with 
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging
> into www.freelists.org
> 
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Correo Yahoo!
Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis! 
¡Abrí tu cuenta ya! - http://correo.yahoo.com.ar
---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: