[rollei_list] Re: Manual FX?

I suspected as much!  Was just curious...

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Sanders McNew <sanders@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Only because I thought it would be fun.  :-)
> And because I worry about the day that Paul
> Ebel tells me my shutters have all gone beyond
> repair and the used market thins out.
>
> In the meantime, my C and E and Teles will
> continue to serve my purposes.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:59:37 -0800
> Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Manual FX?
> From: Richard Sintchak <rich815@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Sanders,
> What is it with the FX that attracts you that you do not feel you get with
> good-condition earlier models?
> --
> Richard S.
>
>
>
> A guy can dream, yes?  Judging from
> Emmanuel's reply, I am not alone here:
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:24:12 +0100
> From: Emmanuel Bigler <Emmanuel.Bigler@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Manual FX?
>
> ...
>
> But I agree that most of the rolleiphile gang including myself would
> like something like a modern Rolleicord, a modern 2.8 E3 or 3.5 E3 with
> no built-in meter, ...
>
>
> Yeah!  _That's_ what I'm talking about!  :-)
>



-- 
Richard S.
San Francisco

My Photography Website
http://www.lightshadowandtone.com

My Flickr River
http://flickriver.com/photos/rich8155/popular-interesting/

My Commute Photo Blog
http://shootingonthefly.blogspot.com/

Other related posts: