I suspected as much! Was just curious... On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Sanders McNew <sanders@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Only because I thought it would be fun. :-) > And because I worry about the day that Paul > Ebel tells me my shutters have all gone beyond > repair and the used market thins out. > > In the meantime, my C and E and Teles will > continue to serve my purposes. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:59:37 -0800 > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Manual FX? > From: Richard Sintchak <rich815@xxxxxxxxx> > > Sanders, > What is it with the FX that attracts you that you do not feel you get with > good-condition earlier models? > -- > Richard S. > > > > A guy can dream, yes? Judging from > Emmanuel's reply, I am not alone here: > > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:24:12 +0100 > From: Emmanuel Bigler <Emmanuel.Bigler@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Manual FX? > > ... > > But I agree that most of the rolleiphile gang including myself would > like something like a modern Rolleicord, a modern 2.8 E3 or 3.5 E3 with > no built-in meter, ... > > > Yeah! _That's_ what I'm talking about! :-) > -- Richard S. San Francisco My Photography Website http://www.lightshadowandtone.com My Flickr River http://flickriver.com/photos/rich8155/popular-interesting/ My Commute Photo Blog http://shootingonthefly.blogspot.com/