[rollei_list] Re: Manual FX?
- From: Richard Sintchak <rich815@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:20:51 -0800
Or E or C.....I know there are distinct differences and know most of them. But I've seen Sanders do great work with earlier Rolleiflexes he already has and was just curious what he is after in an unmetered FX? On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Austin Franklin < austin.franklin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Richard, > > > What is it with the FX that attracts you that you do not feel you > > get with good-condition earlier models? > > By earlier, do you mean like a 2.8F? > > Best Regards, > > Austin > > >
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: Manual FX?
- From: Richard Sintchak
- [rollei_list] Re: Manual FX?
- From: Austin Franklin
- [rollei_list] Re: Manual FX?
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Manual FX? - Sanders McNew
- » [rollei_list] Re: Manual FX? - Austin Franklin
- » [rollei_list] Re: Manual FX? - chatanooga
- » [rollei_list] Re: Manual FX? - Richard Sintchak
- » [rollei_list] Re: Manual FX? - Austin Franklin
- » [rollei_list] Re: Manual FX? - Emmanuel Bigler
- » [rollei_list] Re: Manual FX? - Richard Sintchak
- » [rollei_list] Re: Manual FX? - John Wild
- » [rollei_list] Re: Manual FX? - Carlos Manuel Freaza
- » [rollei_list] Re: Manual FX? - Sanders McNew
- » [rollei_list] Re: Manual FX? - Richard Sintchak