[rollei_list] Re: I'm looking for a Rolleiwide. Is it a sensible pursuit?
- From: Peter Mattei <petermattei@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:29:09 -0700
Jerry, I have the 16-exposure 645 back for the SL66 along with the mask
kit. I'll show it to you next time we get together. Peter
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jerry Lehrer <glehrer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Vick,
>
> I have used the Zeiss 50mm Distagon on my Hasselblad for many years. It
> blows away the Rolleiwide, PLUS it
> is mostly used with the 16 exposure 645 back.
>
> I would say that the Rollei SL 66 and a CZ 50mm Distagon would be
> equivalent if a 16 exposure 645 back were available for it.
>
> BTW, there is no such thing as a wide angle lens that is "too sharp"!
>
> Jerry Lehrer
>
>
> On 9/25/2012 9:35 AM, vick.ko@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Thank you for the input.
>
> So, how is it compared to the Hasselblad 50mm FLE lens? Is that lens
> significantly different than the 4.0FW?
> Too sharp maybe?
>
> Vick
>
>
>
--
*This message is intended for a particular addressee only and may contain
business or company secrets. If you have received this email in error,
please contact the sender and delete the message immediately. Any use of
this email, including saving, publishing, copying, replication or
forwarding of the message or the contents is not permitted. *
Other related posts: