[rollei_list] Re: Hearing Aid Batteries in Nikon F

  • From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 23:40:54 -0800


----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc James Small" <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 10:17 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Hearing Aid Batteries in Nikon F


At 12:50 AM 3/4/2010, Richard Knoppow wrote:

>    Did you make any comparisons of readings with the
>alkaline cells vs mercury cells? I have not done that but
>have compared mercury with zinc-air and found no difference
>but the voltages are closer. It may well be that plain old
>alkaline cells will work in most equipment.

Richard

The issue is two-fold.  First, what is the
acceptance levels of film?  For most purposes,
black and white films can produce decent images
about two stops down and three up, meaning that
an image which ought to be made at, say, 1/30" at
f/8 will produce a printable image at f/4 or
f/22.  This might be extreme, but my own rather
extensive experience indicates that b&w films
certainly will permit a latitude of at least one
stop.  Color reversal films certainly allow a
margin of at least 2/3 of a stop either way,
while chromes are more demanding, and 1/3 of a
stop is probably a matter of wisdom.

Second, most European cameras have "compensated
circuitry" with inbuilt voltage regulation, so
any power source will work, and work at the
prescribed voltage.  The Japanese manufacturers
pushed for the mercury cell as its flat discharge
rate allowed them to eliminate this bridge circuit to lower production costs.

But, in the end, the difference between 1.3 and
1.5 volts will not matter a damn for non-critical
photography.  Use what you have, and take pictures!

Marc

I don't know what is included in "most" European equipment. Certainly anything designed to work from alkaline cells must have some sort of voltage regulator but one of the advantages of mercury cells is that the output voltage was stable enough not to need one. Regulators by nature must dissipate some power so there is an advantage in battery operated devices if you can eliminate the need for the regulator. B&W film, because of the way the speed standard is written, has little underexposure latitude but lots for overexposure. In general, color films are more critical but modern ones have a very considerable latitude. I don't have a copy of the standard for color negative materials so don't know where the speed point is. Likely it is up the curve further than the B&W one. Reversal materials, either B&W or color, are very critical of exposure because virtually all the halide in them is used. Here I refer to reversal material designed for direct viewing. There are reversal materials made with much lower contrast, for instance, for direct duplication of motion picture negatives. This material is designed to duplicate the relatively low contrast of the original negative material. Nonetheless, it is quite critical of exposure. OTOH, its never used in cameras, only in the lab under very well controlled conditions. The difference between 1.5V and 1.3V is about 87%, or about a 13% error. Not astronomical. However its effect depends on the circuit its powering. If the circuit is linear the difference is minimal but not all circuits are linear. Anyway, I've found a satisfactory and practical work around for the absense of mercury cells. BTW, I have been trying to find solid numbers on the relative amounts of mercury in mercury cells an in compact fluorescent lamps. There actually isn't much in either but I am wondering if mercury cells got a bad rap. Much of the mercury polluting the oceans comes from burning coal and other industrial activity. Its bad stuff but sometimes regulators get wierd.

--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: