I don’t think that will be an issue with a .6 burn time Jack G From: roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Trammell Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2012 6:17 PM To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [roc-chat] Re: 4" Goblin on K2045 Forgot about grain collapse. Looks like some more research is in order. It is rocket science after all :-) Thanks all, On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Gene Engelgau wrote: At 92 g's You could collapse the propellant grains and make a big boom! Fiber glassing the fins will not help in that case. -- - Regards Gene Engelgau KI6IBL, NAR 86770 / TRA 12243 - L3 http://fruitychutes.com <http://fruitychutes.com/> - Consumer and Aerospace Recovery Solutions Like us on Facebook! <http://www.facebook.com/fruitychutes> Follow us on Twitter! <http://twitter.com/fruitychutes/> 408-499-9050 On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 5:21 PM, JACK GARIBALDI < JackGaribaldi@xxxxxxx <javascript:parent.wgMail.openComposeWindow('JackGaribaldi@xxxxxxx')> > wrote: Maybe glass the fins and I think it will work Jack Sent from my Mil Spec IPhone 4S On Apr 1, 2012, at 5:11 PM, "Steve Trammell" < stramm8235@xxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:parent.wgMail.openComposeWindow('stramm8235@xxxxxxxxxxx')> > wrote: I'm thinking of flying a 4" Goblin (stock build + fin fillets) on a CTI K2045. I've flown this rocket on a number of K motors including 2 successful K1100 flights. The K1100 flights pulled 40g's and reached 1,000 MPH. A K2045 flight sims to 92g's and 1100+ MPH. Any thoughts? Also, does CTI V-Max propellant use standard delay charges or are electronics needed like AT Warp9 propellant?