[relug] Re: [MS]Codice
- From: matteo.acerbi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: relug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:59:18 +0100
In data Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:45:57 +0100
Marco Bertolini - Sal <marco.bertolini1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> scrisse:
> e ribadisco che se loro volessero prendere netBSD ed infilarlo
> completamente dentro il codice di win potrebbero farlo legalmente.
non e` proprio cosi` vero:
da http://netbsd.org/Goals/redistribution.html:
"Though the Berkeley license is generally used as the template for the
license terms of works that are part of the NetBSD source tree, it does
not apply to all works in the source tree, and you should check the
individual source files to see what license applies to them. In
particular, certain parts of the source tree are covered by the GNU
General Public License (also known as the GPL), which is very different
from the Berkeley license. Though we would like all of the software that
we distribute to be covered by a Berkeley-style license, we can't make
other people change their license terms, and we don't have an infinite
amount of time to rewrite all of the software that we need."
la GPL e` dappertutto :-)
ciao
ax
Other related posts:
