[pure-silver] Re: portraits for a book
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:33:56 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stein" <rstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 2:24 AM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: portraits for a book
>
> Dear Shannon,
>
> I cannot comment about publisher's requirements but I
> can second what
> Richard Knoppow said re. distance from the subject and
> choice of focal
> length. Whatever format you are going to work in, think in
> terms of a focal
> length that is 1.5 to 2 times the diagonal of your
> negative.
>
> As far as film goes....well tell us more about the
> look of the image
> that you want to present. If it is graininess that moves
> you the TRI X in
> 35mm blown up suitably might be the way to go. If you want
> smoother results
> perhaps the same film in medium format or 4 x 5. Or if you
> are wedded to the
> 35mm size try a lower ASA film like T MAX 100 or Ilford FP
> 4. As you are
> supplying lighting for your portraits you will have to
> supply a little more
> but the results in smoother negs will be worth it.
>
> Lighting is simple. $ 20,000 of strobe equipment and a
> studio the size
> of a zeppelin hanger is all you need. Or a nice clear
> lounge room window and
> a reflector or two. I favour the zeppelin hanger option
> myself. Haunt the
> local bookstore for lighting books and try to get
> something written by the
> British author Roger Hicks. He is funny and accurate in
> what he writes
> about.
>
> Uncle Dick
>
>
A reminder that Tri-X in 35mm and roll film is not the
same emulsion as Tri-X sheet film. Why Kodak decided to use
the same name for two very different emulsions is beyond me.
The 35mm and roll film ISO-400 Tri-X is the stuff that made
the film's reputation. It is a medium-toe, general purpose
film. Tri-X sheet film, ISO-320, is the very long toe film I
wrote about earlier. The two films have significantly
different tonal renditions. If the sort of tonal rendition
given by Tri-X ISO-400 film is desired in a sheet film then
a medium or short-toe film should be chosen. Kodak T-Max,
Iford HP-5, Agfa Agfapan 400, Fuji Neopan 400, are all in
this catagory.
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: was: Argento-ferrotype prints Now: emulsion-to-go?
- From: Brian Reynolds
- [pure-silver] Re: was: Argento-ferrotype prints Now: emulsion-to-go?
- From: Charlie Thorsten
- [pure-silver] Re: was: Argento-ferrotype prints Now: emulsion-to-go?
- From: Brian Reynolds
- [pure-silver] portraits for a book
- From: shannon stoney
- [pure-silver] Re: portraits for a book
- From: Stein
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] portraits for a book
- » [pure-silver] Re: portraits for a book
- » [pure-silver] Re: portraits for a book
- » [pure-silver] Re: portraits for a book
- » [pure-silver] Re: portraits for a book
- » [pure-silver] Re: portraits for a book
- » [pure-silver] Re: portraits for a book
- » [pure-silver] Re: portraits for a book
- » [pure-silver] Re: portraits for a book
- » [pure-silver] Re: portraits for a book
- » [pure-silver] Re: portraits for a book
- » [pure-silver] Re: portraits for a book
- » [pure-silver] Re: portraits for a book
- » [pure-silver] Re: portraits for a book
- [pure-silver] Re: was: Argento-ferrotype prints Now: emulsion-to-go?
- From: Brian Reynolds
- [pure-silver] Re: was: Argento-ferrotype prints Now: emulsion-to-go?
- From: Charlie Thorsten
- [pure-silver] Re: was: Argento-ferrotype prints Now: emulsion-to-go?
- From: Brian Reynolds
- [pure-silver] portraits for a book
- From: shannon stoney
- [pure-silver] Re: portraits for a book
- From: Stein