[pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: Bob Randall <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:03:11 -0600
On 12/31/06 1:49 PM, "Dana H. Myers" <dana.myers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Bob Randall wrote:
>> On 12/31/06 11:48 AM, "afterswift@xxxxxxx" <afterswift@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Long before I bought a digital camera, I was scanning film prints
>> and distributing those image files on the Net. And had a solid
>> negative record to boot. There is no excuse for not using film
>> cameras digitally and B&W processing for permanence.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>>
>> I read this dribble (the entire thread, not just this particular
> ^^^^^^^
>> response)
>
> Just curious if you mean "dribble" or "drivel". The context seems
> to indicate the latter.
>
> Dana
> ==============================================================================
> ===============================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
> and unsubscribe from there.
Sorry,
Drivel.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
