Randy,
The reason folks are making an issue out of the crossover between film and
digital and back again is to preserve OPTIONS. That is multiple approaches to
photography so it doesn't get locked into one technology. That means freedom
for us. If you can't fathom that, there's nothing I can do about it.
Bob R
-----Original Message-----
From: bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:01 AM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak
commercial
On 12/31/06 11:48 AM, "afterswift@xxxxxxx" <afterswift@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Long before I bought a digital camera, I was scanning film prints and
distributing those image files on the Net. And had a solid negative record to
boot. There is no excuse for not using film cameras digitally and B&W
processing for permanence.
Bob
I read this dribble (the entire thread, not just this particular response) all
over the internet and I’m always left wondering the same thing. Why are
people so passionate about such meaningless stuff. Why would anyone care what
someone else does or what equipment they use. How does any answer validate
someone’s choice. It seems childish to me.
Bob
________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security
tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free
AOL Mail and more.