[pure-silver] Re: Update On The Digital-Film War

  • From: `Richard Knoppow <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 19:40:01 -0700

I can understand the need for the extremely high performance digital camera by someone working in the top end of commercial photography these days. This camera with a couple of lenses, is on the order of $80,000. If it earns its keep its justifiable and maybe, from a competitive standpoint, necessary. If one assumes a factor of about 10 times to figure equivalent prices c.1950 it would still have been very expensive.
I also like "wet" or chemical photography, I enjoy it but understand the advantages of working electronically. I long ago decided commercial/professional photography was no fun but after thirty years in television came to the same conclusion about that too. Advanced technology sometimes has peculiar side effects.
BTW, another hobby is restoring vacuum tube radios. I can do that as a hobby but much current stuff is either not repairable at all (toss it and buy a new one) or has to be sent back to the factory.

On 9/17/2016 7:04 PM, Richard Lahrson wrote:

Hi,

     I shoot all analog, even trips.  I just like the chemicals!  As a kid
I had a Gilbert kid's chemistry set.  Like all kids, the first thing I
did was make gunpowder and blow up cans.  I suppose nowadays
kid's chemistry sets are toned down.  I get enough digital just living.
Rich

On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Tim Daneliuk <tundra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:tundra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    On 09/17/2016 07:38 PM, Gmail Robert Randall wrote:
    > I just purchased a Phase XF camera with a 100 MP IQ3 digital
    back, along with 3 new Schneider blue line lenses. I make my
    living with cameras like this, and I don't expect the wedding pro
    or hobby enthusiast to comprehend the purchase. It shoots in true
    16 bit with a 15 stop dynamic range. It is without doubt the most
    spectacular camera I've ever owned.
    >
    > I spent 25 years shooting large format table top product, and
    the last 15 years shooting portraits and lifestyle. I can't think
    of one situation I've encountered in 40 years of shooting images
    for ad agencies that this camera couldn't handle as well, or
    better than, any camera I've ever used.

    Yeah, there's no question that if my livelihood depended on
    photography,
    I'd be shooting high end digital.  The economics of immediate feedback
    and relatively easy corrective action make it the only real game
    in town.

    --
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Tim Daneliuk tundra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:tundra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/

    
=============================================================================================================
    To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org
    <//www.freelists.org> and logon to your account (the same
    e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and
    unsubscribe from there.



--
Richard Knoppow
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
WB6KBL

Other related posts: