[pure-silver] Re: RE3200 SHEET FILM? was Re: Ilford developers
- From: <C.Breukel@xxxxxxx>
- To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:55:23 +0200
Bob,
Perhaps some food for thought (hope it does not freze your
system..;-)..)
http://www.apug.org/forums/forum187/28015-ilford-photo-harman-technology
-need-ulf-feedback.html
or
http://tinyurl.com/2msftu
last page answer
02-08-07, 06:22 PM #71 (permalink)
Simon R Galley
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cheshire UK
Posts: 547
Default
Dear John,
If we do make a fast sheet film, and that is not an agreed project it
would take between 14 and 16 months to develop, coat and test.
So it will have to be HP5+ this time around for sure.
Regards
Simon.
(Simon is one of the heads of Ilford)
Best,
Cor
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pure-silver-
> bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of BOB KISS
> Sent: donderdag 13 september 2007 15:52
> To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [pure-silver] RE3200 SHEET FILM? was Re: Ilford developers
>
> DEAR LIST,
> I have always wondered why neither Kodak nor Ilford have sold
their
> 3200 speed films as sheet films. Where else would one really LOVE the
> speed
> and not care as much about the grain? Don't you find that curious?
> I lust after Delta 3200 in 8X10. Can you imagine that speed?
Even
> after filter factors and/or bellow factors you could use a high F# and
not
> have to expose for seconds!
> Anyone know anyone at those places? Maybe we could induce them
to
> make some in those sizes?
> CHEERS!
> BOB
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Knoppow
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 10:19 PM
> To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Ilford developers
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shannon Stoney" <shannonstoney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 6:51 PM
> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Ilford developers
>
>
> > Thanks, this is the answer I was looking for. I am
> > thinking of switching from DDX to ID-11 in order to get
> > slightly less grain. But, DDX is very convenient, as it
> > is already diluted and it is easy to make slightly
> > different dilutions, like 1+4, 1+6, and 1+8, for different
> > purposes.
> >
> > --shannon
> >
> If fine grain is what you want check out Ilford
> Perceptol or Kodak Microdol-X. These two are identical and
> are extra-fine-grain developers when used full strength.
> There will be a speed loss of about 3/4 stop, not a lot and
> grain is noticably finer than D-76 type developers.
> When either developer is used with ISO-100 speed Tabular
> grain films, such as Kodak 100T-Max, Ilford Delta 100, or
> Fuji Acros, the grain is nearly as fine as the late,
> lamented Kodak Technical Pan but with about four times the
> speed and with no problems with contrast control. While Tech
> Pan had extrememely high resolution the resolution of the
> above three films is around 200 lp/mm for high contrast
> targets, which is very high. My experience using this
> combination for 35mm is that the negatives begin to have the
> smoothness of tone rendition I associate with larger
> formats.
> A caviet, the combination has almost no acutance effect
> so mushy lenses will be very obvious.
> Xtol is nearly as fine grain and some what sharper. Also
> Xtol has some speed gain, about the same as Microphen,
> T-Max, DDX, etc., that is other Phenidone developers. It is
> also sharper than Perceptol or Microdol. The only drawack to
> Xtol is the well known sudden death syndrome.
>
> ---
> Richard Knoppow
> Los Angeles, CA, USA
> dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
========================================================================
==
> ==
> =================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to
your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>
>
========================================================================
==
> ===================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to
your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
============================================================================================================To
unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account
(the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and
unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
