As a long-time black and white worker who has begun to do wet color work in the last year, I would welcome the addition of color discussion. I'm not sure I would have had the confidence to venture into color without the resources available in the color forum on APUG. --Ben ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 4:36:44 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Beautiful Photography ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Daneliuk" <tundra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <undisclosed-recipients:> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 12:47 PM Subject: [pure-silver] Beautiful Photography > ... even if it is in color: > > http://public.fotki.com/JohNik/net/lj/dima-chatrov/ > > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Tim Daneliuk tundra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ > I am beginning to wonder if this list should continue to be confined to B&W. The reasoning is that "chemical" color photography is based on the same silver emulsion technology as B&W. Since the whole field of chemical photography (my term) has shrunk so much since the introduction of electronic (digital) photography perhaps such restrictions should not continue. What say others? -- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.