JohnStockdale wrote: > >So if I know that a densitometer was in fact giving me just silver density,= >=20 >I would be happy enough. I could then compare the effect on paper of=20 >stained and non-stained negatives of approx equal silver density, and make= >=20 >up a table of adjustments. Juergen says "the B&W densitometer measures a large spectrum around the maximum sensitivity of the human eye (green colour) it will also measure yellow, green or brown stains. The problem of interpreting the density values (translsate them into filter setting) is caused by the point, that if you print the negative on a multigrade paper, you use the Yellow and/or Magenta filter. In case of a stained negative the resulting filter is different from the enlarger filter. I.e. both filter values are changed. Also the stain is more colourful in the highlights (darker parts of the neg.), compared to the shadows. This fact leads on one side to the wonderful highlight details, that are one of the main reasons for using pyro. On the other side it shifts the necessary light and shadow exposure into two different directions. In other words: The densitometer reading of pyro negatives is not so useful as the one on colour neutral negatives." So IOW the density reading from a pyro negative may not be an accurate guide to the required contrast filtration if you're using VC paper - which is fair enough. As the instrument measures a wide colour spectrum it will presumably read both the silver and stain densities and give you an effective total. Regards Richard ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.