I took a look at Chuck's images. The last one is really nice but the foggy scene does not allow to make a statement about highlight separation. The image from October definitely has trouble with highlight separation. It is far too soft for my taste. Maybe fixed-grade papers are the answer for pyro negatives. Is pyro really worth the trouble, though? Regards Ralph W. Lambrecht On 12/23/04 3:54 PM, "Peter De Smidt" <pdesmidt@xxxxxxx> wrote: > DarkroomMagic wrote: > >> That's what I was afraid of. The pyro stain is the opposite of what I'm >> after. Some photographers like the 'rolling-off' highlights; I prefer >> brilliant, high-contrast highlights with maximized separation. >> >> >> >> >> > I used PMK and Tri-X for a good while. I had problems getting good > highlight separation when using VC papers. Yes, I did testing to try an > fix this. It worked very well, though, for scenes of a very large > brightness range. On the otherhand, Chuck Pere sent some very nice > prints to the print exchange from Tmax 100 film developed in PMK. > > -Peter > ============================================================================== > =============================== > To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your > account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) > and unsubscribe from there. ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.