Re: help with c++ if test

I don't see why you would use goto for this.  I would tackle it this way:

std::string test;
std::cin >> test;
if (test == "fine") {
std::cout << "It works!" << endl;
}


If you want to use code that prints it works lots of times and you
don't want to have to keep typing the cout line, stick it into a
function and call it when you need it.  Like this:

// Function displays a message telling the user that what they did works.
void good ()
{
std::cout << "It works." << endl;
}
// Function displays a message saying it didn't work.
void bad ()
{
std::cout << "Opps, try again!":  << endl;
}

Then, all you have to do is call it if the situation warrants it:

Int main ()
{
std::cin >> test;
if (test == "fine") {
good ();
}
else
{
bad ();
}
return 0;
}

Better still would be to put these into a class called Feedback and
call them as member functions.
Hth,
Alex M

On 2/9/11, Kristoffer Gustafsson <kg84@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi.
> ok, some code of mine looks like
> #include <iostream>
> int main()
> {
> string test;
> cin >>test;
> if (test=="fine" goto good;
>
> good:
> cout <<"it works!";
> return 0;
> }
>
> I try this and I get expected `before goto.
> What can be wrong?
> /Kristoffer
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Perry" <whistler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 7:53 PM
> Subject: RE: help with c++ if test
>
>
> It is easy to do text adventures or any programming without goto.  Note that
> my commercial mud has 0 goto statements in it.  Now all classes in college
> will tell you to avoid goto unless you're dealing with programming operating
> systems and need to be able to jump out of scope.  Which is one of the
> reasons you do not want to use goto.  For example
>
>  Void myfunc(){
> Goto two;
> }
>
> Void myFunc2(){
> Two:
>
> }
>
> You can actually jump function to function with goto which breaks all kinds
> of things in functional and object oriented programming.  Now that is
> necessary some times when doing error handling.  The truth is though if your
> coding your own application you really should never need goto.   If you find
> yourself using goto you have probably designed your program wrong.
>
> I will not go into a deep why or why not to use it because if your thinking
> you cannot create an adventure game without it you will not understand a lot
> of my explanation.  I think you need to go through some tutorials on c or
> c++ which ever one you're using because you have a lot to learn.
>
>
>
> Ken
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kristoffer
> Gustafsson
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 1:41 PM
> To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: help with c++ if test
>
> Hi.
> Without goto it would be very hard to do text adventures.
> I don't think it can be done, or can it?
> Also, if I want my program to exit instead of continuing, how do I do?
> I mean for example, if I die in an adventure, I want to exit the program at
> that time, not continue the game.
> /Kristoffer
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 7:28 PM
> Subject: Re: help with c++ if test
>
>
>> That produces all sorts of problems. jumping to the bottom of a loop is no
>> problem with a goto, and it avoids issues with your exiting variable. it's
>> also quicker, because you just jump to the bottom. otherwise you may
>> break, but it's still going to have to do one more check (two, actually,
>> depending on how the compiler does things) to see if exiting is false.
>> On 2/9/2011 11:23 AM, Lex wrote:
>>> 09.02.2011 20:17, Littlefield, Tyler пишет:
>>>> really really highly recommend you avoid goto. This isn't basic, and
>>>> they're not very useful except for in some odd cases, far and few
>>>> between. Such as jumping out of two nested loops like so:
>>>> int i, j;
>>>> for (i = 0; i < 100; i++)
>>>> {
>>>> for (j = 0; j < 100; j++)
>>>> {
>>>> if (i+j == 100)
>>>> goto botttom;
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>> bottom:
>>>> //do something here
>>>
>>> Actually, effect you're trying to achieve is more correctly by the
>>> conditional variable (at least in terms of procedural programming):
>>> bool exiting=false;
>>> for (i = 0; i < 100 && !exiting; i++)
>>> {
>>> for (j = 0; j < 100 && !exiting; j++)
>>> {
>>> if (i+j == 100)
>>> exiting=true;
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> or may be even
>>> for (j = 0; j < 100; j++)
>>> {
>>> if (i+j == 100)
>>> {
>>> exiting=true;
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> Lex
>>>
>>> __________
>>> View the list's information and change your settings at
>>> http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ty
>>
>> __________
>> View the list's information and change your settings at
>> http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
> __________
> View the list's information and change your settings at
> http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
> __________
> View the list's information and change your settings at
> http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
> __________
> View the list's information and change your settings at
> http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
>
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind

Other related posts: