Does it have a braille display? If it does, it's a steal. Even if it doesn't, it's an impressive little machine. I've never been too worried about my songs though. I use a victor reader for that or, potentialy, an iPod. The tool for the job, you understand. I'd like to have a note taker that I could program my own little apps for if I watned to. I could do that with the braille plus since it's on linux. I don't think I could do that on the Braille Sense Plus. I've heard horror stories about windows CE. I'd also like to be able to run main stream apps on a note taker. Bet you could run open office on the braille plus. MIght even be able to run eclipse or code::blocks on it since they have linux versions. Am I correct in these assumptions? Alex M On 9/9/10, Ken Perry <whistler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Braille + is only 1395 > $ yes more than a phone but find me a phone with 60 gb drive true it's not a > phone it's a pda but that's what I want. If my Phone breaks I still have > all my music and books and I can send my phone in. > > -----Original Message----- > From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jared Wright > Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 5:34 PM > To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: KeySoft: a modern version under current OS's > > Even the devices without Braille displays usually still run somewhere > near $2000. An unlocked Droid 2 is $569 or something. And the latter > blows the former out of the water in every technical metric possible. I > think there is some merit to the notion of a smaller customer base > meaning you have to increase your profit margin to make it worthwhile, > but I think mostly it's that it's just always been this way, and none of > these companies is going to be the one to take a hit on the bottom line > for what's right. That just isn't how business is done. Of course, if > one of them did, I think the consequences of such a move would surprise > some, Company X included. > > On 09/09/2010 05:27 PM, Sina Bahram wrote: >> You really believe this stuff? Honestly? Even after industry insiders have > come on here and told you that they are making $5,500 per >> product? >> >> Wow ... >> >> Take care, >> Sina >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joseph Lee >> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 5:07 PM >> To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: RE: KeySoft: a modern version under current OS's >> >> Hi, >> Both CPU's use ARM architecture. I'd say the cost is related to low > customer base, exclusive contracts and braille display >> technology as it stands. >> Cheers, >> Joseph >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alex Hall >> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:51 PM >> To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: KeySoft: a modern version under current OS's >> >> Agreed. I have always wondered why it would kill HW and GWM to grab a > Snapdragon or comparable processor, a single or dual core at >> 1ghz, and put it into a braille notetaker. I realize it is not quite that > simple, that embeded systems are not as plug-and-play as >> desktop or laptop systems, but still... would it really be that hard? > After all, the mPower uses an xScale processor while the Apex >> runs on a FreeScale. Sure they also had to port Keysoft from ce4.2 to ce6, > but it still proves that it is possible to switch >> processors. I wonder if any of the new processors are using the ARM > architecture, as I think that is what the Apex uses. Well, as >> another poster said so well, this is nearing a rant so I will stop. >> >> On 9/9/10, Alex Midence<alex.midence@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Some of them are rather pricy and they can get away with it because >>> it's a captive market and a specialty item. Nice if you work there >>> not so nice if you're an end user and have to shell out three or four >>> grand for a device. >>> >>> On 9/9/10, Jared Wright<wright.jaredm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> Cool, thanks for the specifications! Amazing how unimpressive the >>>> technology even in some of these newer adaptive devices is. No modern >>>> smartphone would dare ship with a processor comparable to that in >>>> the Apex, and yet the only way to acquire one is to take out the >>>> equivalent of a car loan or get an agency of some sort to foot the >>>> bill. But I"m teetering on the verge of a rant, so I'll stop. Again. >>>> *smile* >>>> >>>> >>>> On 09/09/2010 01:10 PM, Joseph Lee wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Jared, >>>>> It's X-Scale PXA272 at 416 MHz. Still, in terms of memory >>>>> management, it is not that great - worse than Braille Sense family >>>>> mostly because it runs under CE.NET 4.20. Apex uses Freescale i.MX31 >>>>> at 532 MHz (online >>>>> >> articles >> >>>>> mistakenly wrote that it uses Atom processor) with WinCE 6.0. >>>>> I'd say porting KeySoft over to newer guys might produce confusion >>>>> at first and might generate mixed reviews (which was the case when >>>>> this whole subject was brought before members of BrailleNote List). >>>>> The intention of the originator of this idea was to make espeak >>>>> sound more like a combo of KNGMM (KeyNote Gold Multimedia) and >>>>> Infovox 230 and to write open-source version of KeySoft (almost 15 >>>>> year old code) and rename it to avoid copyright lawsuits. After >>>>> talking to an ex-KeySoft developer about this idea, I >>>>> >> can >> >>>>> see why - since KeySoft is HumanWare's property, HW would defend it >>>>> to the fullest. >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Joseph >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jared >>>>> Wright >>>>> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 9:49 AM >>>>> To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> Subject: Re: KeySoft: a modern version under current OS's >>>>> >>>>> I'm doubting it could run an X server, which means no Gnome. But >>>>> once you take that out you can get Linux distributions downright > microscopic. >>>>> I've seen some that could run on 8MB of memory, although I don't >>>>> know if you could get audio output functioning on those very easily. >>>>> But the nice thing about a Braille display is its data is all just >>>>> text in, text out when you get right down to it. Basically anything >>>>> you could run at the terminal would probably be fair game if you >>>>> were willing to tinker, with only applications that require >>>>> additional hardware support being sketchy such as music players or >>>>> CD burners. Supporting the hardware would be a bigger challenge than >>>>> the technical ceiling of the device in general, really. This is all >>>>> very interesting, I've many times thought about saying Eff the whole >>>>> thing and get one of my friends to try and help me sodder a new >>>>> microchip into my BrailleNote mPower to do this sort of thing. It is >>>>> just an XScale processor if my research is at all reliable. But I > digress. >>>>> >>>>> On 09/09/2010 12:22 PM, Alex Midence wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I am officially drooling. I based the 1 gb thing on how big the >>>>>> distros like vinux seemed to be. How did you get it so small? >>>>>> Does it run gnome? Or, is it all CLI? I was shown the icon during >>>>>> my tech eval last year but it didn't have a braille display. I >>>>>> chose the one I did because the braille display is integrated and >>>>>> it seemed packed with features. I didn't know then that the daisy >>>>>> reader couldn't read rfbd books, the word processor couldn't pull >>>>>> up pdf files, the wi-fi card sucked big nasty rocks and never got >>>>>> reception, you can't use it as a braille display for Jaws , and >>>>>> you couldn't import xls files or export xls files. Does other cool > stuff though. Leave me alone! >>>>>> Everyone has a coping mechanism. It does other cool stuff! It does! >>>>>> Honest. >>>>>> >>>>>> Alex M >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 9/9/10, Ken Perry<whistler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> OH you said one or 2 gb to run Linux if you're running OE Linux >>>>>>> you >>>>>>> >> can >> >>>>>>> >>>>> do >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> it on much less we have 256 mb flash that it runs on and only 64 >>>>>>> mb >>>>>>> >> ram >> >>>>>>> >>>>> of >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> course like I said before we have a 60 gb drive. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ken >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>> [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alex >>>>>>> Midence >>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:44 AM >>>>>>> To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>> Subject: Re: KeySoft: a modern version under current OS's >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You know, it would be really awesome if someone came up with a >>>>>>> braille note taker that ran on linux. I have a braille sense plus >>>>>>> 32 and it has 16 gb of on board memory. You just need 1 or 2 gigs >>>>>>> to run a vinux distro on a machine. It seems a waste to only have >>>>>>> these devices run on windows mobile or, worse, as in the case of >>>>>>> the bs 32, windows CE. They could implement their own desktop >>>>>>> specifically taylored to the machine with their own apps on it but >>>>>>> still give the user access to the command line interface and all >>>>>>> the apps and tools that run in that. Wish I had a note taker I >>>>>>> wasn't using and the funds not to go all shaky at the thought of >>>>>>> experimenting with such an expensive device. Might provide hours of > fun tinkering. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Alex M >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 9/9/10, Joseph Lee<joseph.lee22590@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Alex, >>>>>>>> That's my point as well: why spend time on it when there are >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> alternatives >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> availible? as it is, the current keysoft.exe was specialized to a >>>>>>>> given platform and OS combinations. Writing a modern port of old >>>>>>>> KS would mean re-defining programming strategies to take >>>>>>>> advantage of new CPU's, as >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> well >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> as redesigning interface and algorithms to give users a feell of >>>>>>>> >> using >> >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> BrailleNote app on modern computers. >>>>>>>> From what I read on the BrailleNote List on Wednsday and after >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> consulting >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> former and current KeySoft developers, I came to the conclusion >>>>>>>> that it >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> can >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> be done in theory, but creating such a clone is far from reality >>>>>>>> at this point. I'd say a word from Jamal, Tyler and other expert >>>>>>>> programmers >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> might >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> resolve this situation. >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Joseph >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alex >>>>>>>> Midence >>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 12:25 AM >>>>>>>> To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: KeySoft: a modern version under current OS's >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now, that's a blast from the past. I used Key Soft in high >>>>>>>> school back in the early 1990's. My very first laptop was a >>>>>>>> Keynote (predates keynote gold which I drooled over but never >>>>>>>> got). I can >>>>>>>> >> see >> >>>>>>>> that app doing well in linux but am hard pressed to see how it >>>>>>>> would be worth the trouble to prot to windows xp or windows 7. >>>>>>>> There are many better mainstream alternatives to choose from. >>>>>>>> Linux, though would probably be a good place for it since >>>>>>>> accessible applications are fewer there from what I've been able >>>>>>>> to find. MIght be a nice addition to Vinux. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Alex M >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 9/8/10, Joseph Lee<joseph.lee22590@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi folks, >>>>>>>>> Someone on the BrailleNote List is looking to port KeySoft for >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> DOS/Win95 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> modern OS's such as Linux, Win7 and so forth. I think he is >>>>>>>>> looking for someone to help him out with this task, with an >>>>>>>>> eventual goal of >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> releasing >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> as an open-source product under GPL license. >>>>>>>>> If you want to contact him, write to jkenn337@xxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Joseph >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> __________ >>>>>>>>> View the list's information and change your settings at >>>>>>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> __________ >>>>>>>> View the list's information and change your settings at >>>>>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> __________ >>>>>>>> View the list's information and change your settings at >>>>>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> __________ >>>>>>> View the list's information and change your settings at >>>>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind >>>>>>> >>>>>>> __________ >>>>>>> View the list's information and change your settings at >>>>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> __________ >>>>>> View the list's information and change your settings at >>>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> __________ >>>>> View the list's information and change your settings at >>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> __________ >>>>> View the list's information and change your settings at >>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> __________ >>>> View the list's information and change your settings at >>>> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> __________ >>> View the list's information and change your settings at >>> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Have a great day, >> Alex (msg sent from GMail website) >> mehgcap@xxxxxxxxx; http://www.facebook.com/mehgcap __________ View the > list's information and change your settings at >> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind >> >> __________ >> View the list's information and change your settings at > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind >> >> __________ >> View the list's information and change your settings at >> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind >> >> > > __________ > View the list's information and change your settings at > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > > __________ > View the list's information and change your settings at > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > > __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind