[procps] Re: first part of nls

  • From: Craig Small <csmall-procps@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 23:57:35 +1100

On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 06:40:00AM -0600, Jim Warner wrote:
> It should be ok for the nls merge then the top-nls-resolutions.tgz patches.
> Then the rest of us can check integrity.
It's done, using a nls branch off the main repository. That way if it is
wrong the branch can be ditched.

It looks identical to me, but there you go.
I fixed slabtop -o (again).

Craig Small VK2XLZ   http://enc.com.au/          csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux     http://www.debian.org/      csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint:     5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2  0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5

Other related posts: