[procps] Re: first part of nls

On Dec 21, 2011, at 5:51 PM, Craig Small wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 02:20:36PM -0600, Jim Warner wrote:
>> It does not appear to be merged, and my patches cannot be applied first.
> Merging the nls branch out of Sami's should work ok. The history will be
> a little mixed because the top patches will come on top of the generic
> NLS stuff, but that doesn't matter too much.

But I had 31 patches and only see 24/25 commits.

I want that history I worked hard to maintain, preserved.

I have no faith in this approach.

Jim

Other related posts: