Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?

From: "Niall Litchfield" <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
To: ballester.david@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:40:40 +0000

we could call, oh I don't know a "database appliance" or "raw iron" or
something :)

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:10 AM, David Ballester <ballester.david@xxxxxxxxx
> wrote:

> Hi:
>
> I think that in some years ( may be 10, 15... )  will be only 1 OS
> supported by Oracle, and will be mantained by Oracle. Call it Oracle Linux,
> Oracle OS...  Finally when we will need to put a database, we well talk with
> Oracle and after say the aprox. number of user/transactions/data/purpose...
> after two weeks we will receive a blackbox containing the cpus, disk, and
> software 'ready to use'
>
>
> Ony imagination ;)
>
>
> D.
>
>


-- 
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.orawin.info

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?
  - From: Goulet, Richard

References:
- Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?
  - From: John Thompson
- Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?
  - From: Nuno Souto
- Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?
  - From: David Ballester

Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?

Other related posts: