Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?

From: "John Thompson" <jhthomp@xxxxxxxxx>
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:23:18 -0600

Thinking long-term here, it seems 1 OS would allow incredible growth in
utilization of existing technology.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?
  - From: Goulet, Richard
- RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?
  - From: Mark W. Farnham
- Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?
  - From: Nuno Souto

Other related posts:

» Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - John Thompson
» RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Goulet, Richard
» Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- John Thompson
» Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Niall Litchfield
» RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Mark W. Farnham
» RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Matthew Zito
» Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Nuno Souto
» Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- David Ballester
» Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Niall Litchfield
» RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Goulet, Richard
» RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Goulet, Richard
» RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Goulet, Richard
» Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- richa03