Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?
- From: "John Thompson" <jhthomp@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:23:18 -0600
Thinking long-term here, it seems 1 OS would allow incredible growth in
utilization of existing technology.
Other related posts:
- » Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - John Thompson
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - Goulet, Richard
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - John Thompson
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - Niall Litchfield
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - Mark W. Farnham
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - Matthew Zito
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - Nuno Souto
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - David Ballester
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - Niall Litchfield
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - Goulet, Richard
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - Goulet, Richard
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - Goulet, Richard
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - richa03