Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?
- From: Nuno Souto <dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:37:55 +1100
John Thompson wrote,on my timestamp of 27/11/2008 5:23 AM:
Thinking long-term here, it seems 1 OS would allow incredible growth in utilization of existing technology.
I think you should also ask the question: Should there be competition in any market or not? Because the reasons for multiple OS makers are exactly the same as the reasons for a diversified market. -- Cheers Nuno Souto in overcast Sydney, Australia dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxx -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?
- From: David Ballester
- Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?
- References:
- Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?
- From: John Thompson
- Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?
Other related posts:
- » Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - John Thompson
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - Goulet, Richard
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - John Thompson
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - Niall Litchfield
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - Mark W. Farnham
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - Matthew Zito
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - Nuno Souto
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - David Ballester
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - Niall Litchfield
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - Goulet, Richard
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - Goulet, Richard
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - Goulet, Richard
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - richa03