RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?
- From: "Mark W. Farnham" <mwf@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <jhthomp@xxxxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:44:25 -0500
Yes, there should only be 1 OS. But we've never been able to get Met Life to
open source DTSS.
I believe that will make at least 5 people smile in remembrance and perhaps
a couple dozen groan.
Happy Thanksgiving!
mwf
_____
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of John Thompson
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 1:23 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?
Thinking long-term here, it seems 1 OS would allow incredible growth in
utilization of existing technology.
Other related posts:
- » Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- John Thompson
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Goulet, Richard
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- John Thompson
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Niall Litchfield
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - Mark W. Farnham
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Matthew Zito
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Nuno Souto
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- David Ballester
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Niall Litchfield
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Goulet, Richard
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Goulet, Richard
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Goulet, Richard
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- richa03