RE: RAC newbie question
- From: "Terrian, Thomas J Mr CTR DLA J6DIB" <Tom.Terrian.ctr@xxxxxxx>
- To: "Bort, Guillermo" <guillermo.bort@xxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:45:36 -0400
Ok, thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bort, Guillermo [mailto:guillermo.bort@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 2:40 PM
To: Terrian, Thomas J Mr CTR DLA J6DIB; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: RAC newbie question
There are many factors to consider, on one hand, you can set application
affinity and help the load balancer through that, though running a 9
node database may not be the best. I'd go with 3 clusters (3 nodes each)
and have the clusters as DRS for each other, having Higher availability
and avoiding extra overhead due to cache fusion and separating
databases, specially if they have different production times, SLA, etc.
HTH
Guillermo Alan Bort
EDS - ITO DBA Main Group
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Terrian, Thomas J Mr
CTR DLA J6DIB
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 3:10 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RAC newbie question
I am curious on your thoughts on this.......we have 3 unrelated
databases and 9 boxes to put them on.
Would you recommend one 9 node cluster and put them on that one or three
3 node clusters (one for each database)?
We are looking at the pros/cons of each. Does anyone have any thought
either way?
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
