Re: RAC newbie question
- From: "Li Li" <litanli@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Tom.Terrian.ctr@xxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 16:28:41 -0500
I'd do a 9-node cluster. you don't have to run the databases on all
the 9 nodes but it gives you the flexibility/capability to do so if
you need to. I've built a 5-node cluster to run 3 major/similar ERP
databases with no issue.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Terrian, Thomas J Mr CTR DLA J6DIB
<Tom.Terrian.ctr@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am curious on your thoughts on this.......we have 3 unrelated
> databases and 9 boxes to put them on.
>
> Would you recommend one 9 node cluster and put them on that one or three
> 3 node clusters (one for each database)?
>
> We are looking at the pros/cons of each. Does anyone have any thought
> either way?
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- RAC newbie question
- From: Terrian, Thomas J Mr CTR DLA J6DIB
Other related posts:
- » RAC newbie question
- » RE: RAC newbie question
- » RE: RAC newbie question
- » RE: RAC newbie question
- » RE: RAC newbie question
- » Re: RAC newbie question
- » RE: RAC newbie question
- » Re: RAC newbie question
- » RE: RAC newbie question
- » RE: RAC newbie question
- » Re: RAC newbie question
- » RE: RAC newbie question
- » Re: RAC newbie question
- » Re: RAC newbie question
- » RE: RAC newbie question
- » RE: RAC newbie question
- » Re: RAC newbie question
- » Re: RAC newbie question
- RAC newbie question
- From: Terrian, Thomas J Mr CTR DLA J6DIB