Re: Oracle on Windows 2000 AS with /3GB flag
- From: "Yavor Ivanov" <Yavor_Ivanov@xxxxxxxx>
- To: wjwagman@xxxxxxxxxxx, Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx, saints.richard@xxxxxxxxx, oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:56:24 +0300
The switch is no relevant to 64 bit platforms.
On 32 bit platforms, any process can address 4 GB memory (this is 2^32
bytes), but has the right to use only the lower 2 GB (minus some kylobytes at
the start and the end, for boundery checking). The upper 2 GB are reserved for
the OS.
The the /3GB switch changes this ratio to 3 GB user addressable space
and 1 GB for the OS. This is address space per process, no actually consumed
memory - even Notepad has the same address space, private for it's process.
I have used this switch on many servers without any issue.
On 64 bit platforms any process can address much more memory. So the
switch does not work - it is not needed.
--
Regards,
Yavor Ivanov
Senior Database Expert
Stemo Ltd
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:51:58 +0300, William Wagman <wjwagman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Allen,
>Does this hold true for 64-bit Windows as well? Until seeing this thread
> I was unaware of the /3GB switch available for windows. It sounds
> analogous to compiling in the hugemem kernel in Linux. Or are the two
> unrelated? On Technet so far the only document I have found is the
> 32-bit Oracle Database Platform Guide, chapter 1. Can you point out a
> good source of information on this please.
>Thanks.
>
> Bill Wagman
> Univ. of California at Davis
> IET Campus Data Center
> wjwagman@xxxxxxxxxxx
> (530) 754-6208
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Allen, Brandon
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 3:07 PM
> To: saints.richard@xxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Oracle on Windows 2000 AS with /3GB flag
>
>
> I always use the /3G flag on all Windows database servers - for both
> Oracle and SQL Server. I've used it several times on different
> combinations of Windows, SQL & Oracle versions and never had any
> problems.
>Regards,
> Brandon
>
> Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
> attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do
> not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions,
> conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to
> the official business of this company shall be understood as neither
> given nor endorsed by it.
>
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
