Re: Oracle Advanced Queue and Java Messaging System(JMS)

  • From: Martic Zoran <zoran_martic@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rjamya@xxxxxxxxx, radu.popescu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 05:54:29 -0700 (PDT)

We do AQ and it is the main part of one big product in
my company.
It is working fine, very fast. Faster then the
products we integrate with :)

But of course it is mainly because AQ is made around
something that is working fine in Oracle for a long
time: tables and PL/SQL :)
With addition to object types that may define message
types if raw message type is not used.

Did not have the chance to try bulk AQ operations that
are available from 10g and making bulk DML into the
main table.

The code is mainly in PL/SQL, but also have a lots of
C++ code interactions with the queue.
We are using just C OCI, because C OCI is with all
functionality from the beggining.
OCCI is pretty new thing and I think OCCI for AQ is
available only from 10g, but not so sure.

I will believe in AQ technology, because many other
things are built on top of it important to Oracle,
like: Streams, Workflow(?), JMS, ...
That is why Oracle needs to improve AQ and improved it
a lot with bulk DML, bulk enqueue/dequeue operations
from the performance point of view.

Regards,
Zoran

> Yes, we do use AQ in production extensively, and
> they work fine for most part. 
> 
> Raj 
> ------------------------------
> select standard_disclaimer from company_requirements
> where category =
> 'MANDATORY';
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> 


        
                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Other related posts: