Re: ASM over SLVM
- From: Naqi Mirza <naqimirza@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 01:07:14 -0800 (PST)
----- Original Message ----
From: Naqi Mirza <naqimirza@xxxxxxxxx>
To: kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, 28 December, 2006 1:56:59 PM
Subject: Re: ASM over SLVM
Yes, those are some of the features listed in the HP doc's for why SLVM over
ASM.
Just wondering though, has anyone done this ? The way I described in in my
earlier post - is that how it would go down?
----- Original Message ----
From: Kevin Closson <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, 28 December, 2006 5:05:14 AM
Subject: RE: ASM over SLVM
*Each ASM disk group member must be a SLVM raw logical volume
*SLVM provides active/standby multi-pathing support for RAC and
single instance ("pvlinks")
*Leverage cluster-wide device
name feature of SLVM
that same info from HP says consider using the full oracle stack
(ie. no SGe for RAC) when using ASM.
any good reasons for using SGe and ASM?
...global device naming alone makes it worth it. Doesn't SLVM also get
you some MPIO? Too many
things missing in an Oracle-only stack to keep track of
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
___________________________________________________________
Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail. "The New Version is radically easier to use" – The
Wall Street Journal
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
Other related posts:
