Hi, Don Munsil wrote: > It's not something that's simply quantifiable. A very clean > 480p image gathered with an excellent 480p camera or telecine > could be every bit as good as a 1080p image scaled to 480p. Maybe. You're comparing optical low-pass filtering with electronic (digital) low-pass filtering. The former is done in the linear-light domain by a gaussian filter, the latter is (probably) done in the gamma domain by a sinc-like filter. Both have opportunities for making sampling artefacts, so it is impossible to tell a priori which would be best. > Practically speaking, the 1080p->480p signal will often look > better, largely because of preservation of edge sharpness. The electronic sinc-like low-pass filter can have a sharper transition band than the optical gaussian filter, and this implies that it will create ringing. This ringing contributes to the sharpness impression, but it is unnatural too... > An image from a 1080p camera downconverted to 480p by a > good-quality algorithm like bicubic That is not a good filter for down-sampling ! You would need at least a 12-taps polyphase FIR filter for decent performance. You could use a transposed polyphase filter with fewer taps (between 4 and 8), see our patent US5892695. The bi-cubic is not good enough for transposing, unless you apply some further tricks. Better to use a polyphase filter with lookup tables. > will probably have better inherent edge sharpness than a > raw unsharpened feed of a signal from a 480p camera. Probably, but it is always a trade-off between sharpness and (aliasing) artefacts. Sometimes less sharpness gives better pictures. I find that one of the potential attractions of HDTV: to give a bit more sharpness for a lot less artefacts. > On the other hand, judicious application of quality sharpening > algorithms to a native 480p image can quite possibly get it to > very nearly the 1080p->480p image. It really depends on the > cameras, the algorithms, the various formats the picture goes > through, etc. We call that PixelPlus, and every major manufacturer has his own version of such algorithms. Sony started it with DRC. Greetings, -- Jeroen +-------------------------------+------------------------------------------+ | From: Jeroen H. Stessen | E-mail: Jeroen.Stessen@xxxxxxxxxxx | | Building: SFJ-5.22 Eindhoven | Deptmt.: Philips Applied Technologies | | Phone: ++31.40.2732739 | Visiting & mail address: Glaslaan 2 | | Mobile: ++31.6.44680021 | NL 5616 LW Eindhoven, the Netherlands | | Pager: ++31.6.65133818 | Website: http://www.apptech.philips.com/ | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------------+ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.