Craig Birkmaier wrote: > An interesting analogy. But what happens if the > company that owns the strip mall will only let certain > food chains compete? That's what could happen *if* OTA relied on a "spectrum utility" concept. But as it is with the current local ownership caps, it shouldn't happen. The OTA spectrum is not controlled by one company. > Sorry Bert, but it does not. Even at the local level > it is VERY hard to get a show on the air, unless you > want to PAY the station for carriage. But Craig. It's also hard for a mom and pop operation to compete against Wendy's. It's hard for small operators to compete against established companies, which have learned the ropes over many years and have the advantage of large scale. > This is the main reason that there are so many > infomercials on broadcast stations - why pay for a > program that will not produce an audience that will > attract local advertisers, when someone is willing to > pay you to run their program? That's a fair business decision. The independent producer can either try to get his stuff on an existing DTT multiplex or can set up his own transmitter. The existing DTT broadcaster can either arrange for some sort of revenue sharing with this independent producer or the local broadcaster can take the easy way out and air some brainless infomercials. These are standard business decisions. I don't see any difference between this and running a supermarket, quite honestly. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.