[oagitm] Re: confidential employees?
- From: Jim Gardner <jgardner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'paolom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <paolom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'OAGITM (oagitm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) (oagitm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)'" <oagitm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 16:27:44 +0000
Here at Clatsop County the Sr. Network Administrator and Information Systems
Analyst are Non-represented. The union has been trying to get these positions
back, but due to the nature of the jobs, unrestricted network access and pay
rate we have been able to keep them as non-represented.
Jim Gardner
Information Systems Manager
800 Exchange, Suite 300
Astoria, OR 97103
Phone: 503-325-8662
From: oagitm-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oagitm-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Murray Paolo
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 2:40 PM
To: OAGITM (oagitm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) (oagitm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: [oagitm] confidential employees?
Are there any organizations (state, county, or city) in the
state whose IS employees are considered "confidential" employees for the sake
of collective bargaining? I'd be interested in hearing from any of you who have
dealt with this issue.
Thanks,
Murray Paolo
Yamhill County
This message has been prepared on resources owned by Clatsop County, Oregon. It
is subject to the Internet and online Services Use Policy and Procedures of
Clatsop County.
Other related posts:
