[mso] Re: Future of Front Page?
- From: Greg Chapman <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: mso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:24:51 -0600
MS has resisted the idea of 'opening' its schema specs for Office and,
in fact, the new Office is less about Office than it is about
repenetrating the server market. As we might recall, they were doing
well at that until, well, a few technically important things like system
security were ignored. New versions of Office are more about leveraging
Sharepoint and about moving to a software system based on a subscription
pricing scheme (kind of like the Holy Grail for developers who need
revenue streams).
Most of what you'll find regarding Office XML schema mods regards
working with and customizing Sharepoint services with .Net (a 'bet' that
has been slow to pay off). For instance:
http://weblog.vb-tech.com/
There is a single site which attempts to treat the complexities of
Word's schema in a way which would allow you to think about defining
modifications to the schema:
http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2006/02/02/523469.aspx
But close study of the page reveals you're not likely to modify the
schema in a dramatically useful way unless you work exclusively within
the host application (which kills one of the dozens of possible
definitions of 'open' in the computing world) or VSTO. It looks to me
like it's just as closed as ever...but more complicated to work with
than when you used VBA and the application object model.
I'm not normally into banging on Microsoft for this or that strategy.
They tend to make bolder moves than I do and they do that well. I am
resistant to unnecessary or unproductive change and I don't *yet* see
that using XML is going to achieve what the market wished XML could do
for Office applications.
Greg
Steve Fredette wrote:
>From: "Dian D. Chapman" <dian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>>You will probably understand this more when you start trying to figure out
>>how to customize Office 2007.
>>
>>
>
> If it follows XML rules, then any schema will do ;-)
>
> Or are we going to be forced to follow MS's schemas? If so, are these
>always called from MS site, or are they installed on the HD? Then again,
>maybe you can't answer that right now ;-) If they are installed to the HD,
>I'll have no problem with Office '07, but from they did with server '03 and
>the COSYS replacement for CDONTS, I'm not a "secure" camper..
>
>Cordially,
>Steven Fredette
>President http://www.prowebsites.net
>Indianapolis, Indiana. USA (-5 GMT/UT)
>"For Your Internet Wants and Needs" Since 1997
>
>
>
*************************************************************
You are receiving this mail because you subscribed to mso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or
MicrosoftOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To send mail to the group, simply address it to mso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To Unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
mso-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" (without the quotes) in
the subject line.
Or, visit the group's homepage and use the dropdown menu. This will also allow
you to change your email settings to digest or vacation (no mail).
//www.freelists.org/webpage/mso
To be able to use the files section for sharing files with the group, send a
request to mso-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and you will be sent an invitation with
instructions. Once you are a member of the files group, you can go here to
upload/download files:
http://www.smartgroups.com/vault/msofiles
*************************************************************
Other related posts:
