[modeleng] Re: Drawings rqd

  • From: "Tim Of The Above" <the_viffer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:44:03 +0000

I'm always surprised of the inaccuracy of the bombing results in WW11 as you 
say Peter. And anyone who says the crews lacked valour or determination can 
see me outside.


>From: peter.chadwick@xxxxxxxxxxx
>Reply-To: modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [modeleng] Re: Drawings rqd
>Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:28:35 +0100
>
>Tim said:
> >Probably good enough to bomb
>Berlin from 18 000 feet tho' if the muse takes you.<
>
>The history of bomber command's navigation accuracy prior to the
>introduction of radio navigational aids suggest that even that is
>unlikely!
>
>Who was it who said " When I hear that the RAF has dropped 300 tons of
>bombs on Germany, the only thing that I am certain of is that 300 tons of
>bombs were exported somewhere in the general direction of Germany"?
>
>
>Peter Chadwick
>Swindon
>
>MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
>
>To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
>modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject 
>line.

_________________________________________________________________
Get Hotmail, News, Sport and Entertainment from MSN on your mobile.  
http://www.msn.txt4content.com/

MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.

To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to, 
modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.

Other related posts: