On Montag 07 Dezember 2009 Edith Schlagenhauf wrote: > as I am working on a 67% GC content genome assembled from 454 Titanium > reads generated in the specified time range, I am wondering what you > exactly meant by this statement? Well, if a simple bacterium (66.5% GC) was sequenced at ~45x coverage and still generates something like 900 (!) contigs with something like 3 megabases consensus, then you know something's wrong. A later sequencing with the same coverage but new ("improved" as Roche called it) kit gave something like 80 contigs and 4 megabases of consensus. Let's just say that there were some unforeseen consequences due to increased read length in the Titaniums coupled with interesting secondary folding effects of high GC sequences. Regards, Bastien -- You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk mailing list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html