[lit-ideas] Re: with or without Bush

  • From: Scribe1865@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 00:28:28 EDT

In a message dated 8/2/2004 11:30:48 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
mccreery@xxxxxxx writes:
It could be, of course, that this whole argument is misconceived, since the 
mere presence or absence of one or another president is supposed to have some 
magical effect.


In some cases, I don't think we can contend that outcomes would be different 
if Gore were President, because many of the constraints on tactics were 
external. We probably didn't want to start pouring massive forces into the 
Pakistani 
tribal area because we feared that Mushareff would be overthrown, pro-Taliban 
factions would try to gain control of the Pak nuke forces, and that would 
cause us to intervene in Pakistan in a particularly terrible way.

This isn't the Eisenhower Presidency either, but a far less powerful 
presidency, its executive powers reigned in and severely checked. For example, 
I doubt 
older-generation presidents would have had the trouble about their mistresses 
that Clinton did. Eisenhower would have silenced Kenneth Starr. Andrew 
Jackson would probably have shot Starr himself.

While I agree (as Kerry said at the Convention) that it would be good to have 
a national leader who believed in science, I also think that the election 
year has everyone drowning in metonymy. 

By this metonymy, "Bush" has come to mean, not Dubya's particular directives 
or policies, but everything that happens. "Bush" becomes our scruples about 
the Pakis. "Bush" becomes FBI bureaucrats covering their butts. "Bush" is the 
PhD sweeping Walmart floors. "Bush" is the tacky, anti-intellectual, 
antipopulist fill-in-the-blank. 

That can't be right. If everything is "Bush," then we can't really complain 
about "Bush" because there's nothing but "Bush" out there, and hence nothing to 
which we can compare "Bush."  It's "Bushes" all the way down.


------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: